• Dasus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        45
        ·
        4 days ago

        50 nonconsecutive laps in a day isn’t even that much, tbh.

        As a cabbie, I could drive 25 fares a day, and if I go back to my station after the fare, then I’d drive one lap while driving the customer home and another while going back myself.

        • atocci@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          4 days ago

          That’s exactly what I was thinking, anyone who drives for their job could easily be crossing the same traffic circle dozens of times a day. That would be against the law?

          • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            27
            ·
            4 days ago

            Spirit vs intention of law, they wouldn’t be ticketing people who do it for work, it would be for people like OP who have nothing better than be a “menace”.

            I’ve thought about getting a few dozen people and just going in a loop around a couple of blocks screwing over the traffic circle. So yeah the laws probably because someone actually decided to do it.

            • CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              17
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              I think you mean spirit vs letter of the law, but yeah, any time you count on cops or courts honoring the ‘spirit of the law’ you’re probably gonna get burned.

              Of course with this law nobody is gonna get burned unless they are actually doing laps. Cops don’t have time to be counting how many times you went through a traffic circle in a day, they’ve got people and dogs to kill.

    • BigDaddySlim@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      4 days ago

      So what you’re saying is you can do 49 donuts around it and it’s perfectly legal. Cops love donuts so I’m sure I’m 100% correct

    • Eiim@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Some of those laws are no longer on the books, so I wonder about that one. Like, what does “around the town square” actually mean? There’s not a straightforward “town square” in Oxford. And while the article asks “What exactly happened to make Oxford so protective of its town square?”, you and I both know the answer is “drunk college students”. Also funny that they don’t actually show the public sidewalk, but instead the little square between Elliot and Stoddard for the sidewalk law.

      Edit: a quick search through the municipal traffic codes doesn’t reveal anything, so I’m guessing this is one of Miami’s many rumors that happened to get picked up by a less-than-thourough website. Or potentially it used to exist but no longer does. Or maybe I missed it, but I’m willing to bet that’s not the case.

      • DaCrazyJamez@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        I think the law was from the late 60s-mid 70s when driving muscle cars around was a popular past time for young men. My guess is it’s a problem that kinda just went away when other types of entertainment became more popular.

    • Ken Oh@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      I would love to get a source on this. I tried but couldn’t find anything. That’s hilarious if true.