![Moon render by me with ultra high surface detail. [4K]](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/c9a7e92b-8c2b-4574-99a6-b6da80db0f94.png){kind=link}
Test render from a very simple blender animation i am working on as early blender learning project.
Feel free to use as you please. Textures courtesy NASA’s Scientific Visualization Studio
Render and texture edits by me, made with Blender.
Test render from a very simple blender animation i am working on as early blender learning project.
Feel free to use as you please. Textures courtesy NASA’s Scientific Visualization Studio
Render and texture edits by me, made with Blender.
Using a different height texture explains the different results. Odd, that the Arizona State University has more bumps than NASA at the same 64ppd resolution. Do you think they added noise to the NASA data? When I add noise to the height map in Blender, I can make it look like this.
Its possible, but its more likely processing the raw data using a different technique that causes the differences. Cant be sure, but yeah this looks alot better now. I didnt add any noise myself, since i dont know how to/hadnt considered it, when i felt it looked a little flat i just went looking for a better topo map.