• CosmoNova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      More of a “doesn’t plan to do a bad thing” moment since they technically didn’t do anything.

    • slimerancher@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Nintendo is actually pretty good for it’s employees, and at developing games. The main reason people don’t like it is how strongly they try to protect their IP.

      • atrielienz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        I actually think this might be an extension of them protecting their IP. Afterall, the IP of plenty of other companies has been mined for use training Generative AI LLM’s.

      • dinckel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        This is it, pretty much. I don’t agree with people who are aggressively against Nintendo in general, especially in cases like the MIG-Switch, but at the same time, they operate in such a bizarre grey area. It’s unbelievably stupid to both prevent software preservation, and not allow legal ways to obtain those titles

  • JoShmoe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    48
    ·
    6 months ago

    Why is this a thing? I’m not for generative ai writing code and making art. I just feel like they’re shooting themselves in the foot here. I love that mod that basically acts as an impromptu dungeon master when you communicate with NPCs.

    • xytaruka@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      That’s your right to enjoy that and there’s a reason it’s a mod, generative is too unpredictable for a company that focuses on high quality family friendly content.

      • KillerTofu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        6 months ago

        But couldn’t they train their own models? They have a huge catalog of data they could train from to make sure it stayed on brand?

        • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          The main uses for AI in game development aren’t generating things on the fly for players anyway, it’s helping artists and coders do their work faster.

    • TAG@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      6 months ago

      What mod for what game are you talking about? Is the mod just writing flavor fluff or is it weaving in important information?

      If it is the former, I don’t care for it. I don’t want to know that farmer John had a good crop of turnips. It is just filler fluff that does not build on the setting but simply makes it look busy for the sake of being busy.

      If it is the latter, I would think that there is a risk that the AI NPC conveys information in a hard to understand or misleading way and players would have a hard time understanding what to do.

      • JoShmoe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Its a Skyrim mod, or a collection of mods. I never used it myself.

    • steeznson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s more like a quality control thing I guess. Generated content is going to be derivitive by its nature so banning it internally is forcing the devs to be creative.