The popular belief that iPhone is a privacy alternative to Android is wrong.Support independent research and analysis by joining my Patreon page: https://www...
There’s an addendum, it depends on how Android is used. If a person gets everything from Play Store which means they logged in to a Google account, Android is disgusting compared to iPhone.
However if a person disables the various Google services and sideloads all of the apps, then yes, Android is superior to iPhone for privacy.
You literally just repeated a fraction of what’s already said in the video. Minus the comprehensive breakdown, pivotal information, sources & annotations.
Nope. He didn’t, the video goes way more indepth than what he said and provides a proper comprehensive break down of the topic.
His comment is surface level at best.
Actually! The title is an accurate representation of the video. It just doesn’t hand you the nuances and comprehensive break down that the video provides.
I say that because clearly they only read the title. It’s funny how his video has 1.5k likes to 15 dislikes but the people from this community are largely down voting.
It’s almost as if this community doesn’t like comprehensive technical breakdowns with tons of sources in the description and would rather feed into their own pre-existing bias.
Their 2 sentences doesn’t cover everything, it’s barley surface level. Their comment isn’t any where near a summary of the video.
Just look at how many sources are in the video description.
There’s an addendum, it depends on how Android is used. If a person gets everything from Play Store which means they logged in to a Google account, Android is disgusting compared to iPhone.
However if a person disables the various Google services and sideloads all of the apps, then yes, Android is superior to iPhone for privacy.
You literally just repeated a fraction of what’s already said in the video. Minus the comprehensive breakdown, pivotal information, sources & annotations.
Saving me and potentially others almost 20mins. Not all heroes.
Nope. He didn’t, the video goes way more indepth than what he said and provides a proper comprehensive break down of the topic.
His comment is surface level at best.
I think they are trying to say that the title is not an accurate representation of the video, not that the video is inaccurate.
Actually! The title is an accurate representation of the video. It just doesn’t hand you the nuances and comprehensive break down that the video provides.
You seem to think a lot of the video.
That’s because I watched it. It’s a video from TheHatedOne, it goes much more indepth than “Android better hur-dur” some seem to be assuming.
I didn’t get that from any of the comments.
I say that because clearly they only read the title. It’s funny how his video has 1.5k likes to 15 dislikes but the people from this community are largely down voting.
It’s almost as if this community doesn’t like comprehensive technical breakdowns with tons of sources in the description and would rather feed into their own pre-existing bias.
I thought YouTube doesn’t show a dislike count anymore… where did you see that?
It may just not be that big of a deal. I wouldn’t worry too much.
Not everyone has time to commit to a 17-minute video.
Then just don’t watch it and move on about your day.
Video Transcript
Thanks, reading it is much better then having some read it to me slowly.
X2 speed exists for a reason…
I thought it was just to make songs sound more exciting. Anyway, I’d rather read it.
The video is 17 minutes. Their comment is 2 sentences.
Their 2 sentences doesn’t cover everything, it’s barley surface level. Their comment isn’t any where near a summary of the video.
Just look at how many sources are in the video description.
It provides far more information than the shitty clickbait title. It actually informs people on the content of the video.
The title really isn’t that clickbait.