Just wonder what if my mail server went offline for some periods, and the sending party couldn’t deliver.

Will there be any consequences except I don’t get the mail? I tried searching but they all in the perspective of a sender and get a bounce, rather the other way around.

  • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    SMTP is designed with queues and retries

    Unless something has changed massively since I was deeply involved with this stuff, the people that sent you email may get a notification after some hours that their message is being delayed, and maybe after like 24-48 hours they might get a bounce. But if it’s just your SMTP server going down for an hour or two every now and then, the system should be able handle that seamlessly (barring some hiccups like messages showing up with timestamps hours in the past which sometimes is confusing).

      • Max-P@lemmy.max-p.me
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        4 months ago

        The problem with this is the probability of your server being available for the next retry is fairly low.

        Usually some sort of exponential backoff is used so it might retry after 5 minutes, 15 minutes, an hour, 3 hours, 6 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours, give up.

        6-8 hours is probably too much for anything serious where you don’t want emails to just drop. It will work so if you’re just using it to sign up to sites and stuff, you can make sure your server is on to receive the verification emails and stuff. But I wouldn’t use it for anything important.

      • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I think 8 hours starts to get into territory where they might get an informational message about the delay? That also starts to be long enough that the emails might get lost in the distant past in the client and never be seen, by the time they arrive.

        I think when I used to do this, it was one advisory message every 24 hours that a message was holding in the queue, and after 5 days it would bounce, but I have to assume that those limits have shrunk in the modern day. How much, IDK; it might be worth experimenting with it though before committing to creating that situation since it might not go okay.

  • cron@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    4 months ago

    Some things to consider:

    • It is typical for mail servers to retry a couple of times for maybe a day or two. The exact values can differ a lot.
    • After this time, the message bounces and the sender (sometimes) gets notified.
    • This bounce might get your address removed from newsletters.
    • umami_wasabi@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      So noting substantial other than I don’t get the mail and might get kick out of newsletters?

      • cron@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        4 months ago

        Correct. But at least for me, even the low risk of some e-mails getting lost is pretty substantial.

        • ErwinLottemann@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          if you need more reliability you can always use a second mailserver as backup, add a second mx record to your domain and if the first one is not responding the second one will be used. there is no limit of how many next servers there can be specified afaik.

  • ikidd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    If you’re concerned about missing emails, you might want to sign up for a forwarder instead. I don’t see the point of running an email server that’s going to be off for long periods of time.

    Generally it’s not going to put you on a blacklist if a sending server doesn’t manage to send, but some have very short queue times before they’ll drop it, so you’re going to miss a lot of mail that way.

    • Amanda@aggregatet.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 months ago

      No need to be that maximalist. Don’t self host email on a desktop machine you turn off.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        4 months ago

        No, don’t self host email. There are so many things that can go wrong and it will be constantly attacked

        • umami_wasabi@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          Sounds like you had an awful experience about self-hosting email. Want to share with this community so everyone learns?

          • Suzune
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            I’ve been self-hosting Postfix for several years and it’s not difficult, if you’re absolutely confident what you do. I don’t recommend it if you don’t know basic behaviors and internals of SMTP and relaying. Also you need to know how to secure your server so you don’t get spammed a lot and getting hammered with brute force attacks.

            From time to time you need to react to delivery problems. Most interesting one is perhaps Microsoft, which you need to ask to whitelist your server or your email won’t be accepted.