return2ozma@lemmy.world to Leftism@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-23 months agoOur Verdict on Kamala Harris’s New Plans - Jacobinjacobin.comexternal-linkmessage-square7fedilinkarrow-up122arrow-down113
arrow-up19arrow-down1external-linkOur Verdict on Kamala Harris’s New Plans - Jacobinjacobin.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to Leftism@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-23 months agomessage-square7fedilink
minus-squarenednobbins@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down3·3 months agoWhy is that the choice we need to make? What stopped her from coming up with an economic plan that was better? Why did she need to include the parts that were actively bad?
minus-squareFlying Squid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down3·3 months agoBecause, like it or not, there are only two possible people who will be in the Oval Office next year and one is a genocidal dictator.
minus-squarenednobbins@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down4·3 months agoHow does that stop Harris from coming up with a sound economic plan? Doesn’t that make it even more important that she present a good plan?
minus-squareFlying Squid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down2·3 months agoI never said it did stop her. I said, and I quote: I don’t want “most are meh,” but I’ll take it over genocidal dictatorship.
Why is that the choice we need to make?
What stopped her from coming up with an economic plan that was better?
Why did she need to include the parts that were actively bad?
Because, like it or not, there are only two possible people who will be in the Oval Office next year and one is a genocidal dictator.
Removed by mod
How does that stop Harris from coming up with a sound economic plan?
Doesn’t that make it even more important that she present a good plan?
I never said it did stop her. I said, and I quote:
Removed by mod