Starbucks says Niccol can live in his home in Newport Beach, California and commute to Starbucks’ head office 1,000 miles away on a corporate jet

  • SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Didn’t they change the law so you can’t track private flights anymore? Or was Melon Husk just trying to get that done? Or was that just me imagining things again? 🤔

      • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        4 months ago

        It’s also not something that you can really stop people from doing.

        You might be able to stop people sharing the information freely, but, the transponders that people track and the protocols and standards for the communication are well known internationally. It doesn’t take more than $50 in parts to set up your own receiver and connect it to a computer.

        I’d consider any law prohibiting the observation of air traffic by the public to be impossible to enforce. How can you stop someone from listening by law?

        Sharing the information, however, that’s a bit different.

    • Xtallll@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      4 months ago

      The FAA reauthorization act slipped in that ownership of private jets could remain anonymous. So you can still track them, because all flight plans are public and need to be for safety reasons, but they no longer have to tell you who owns what tail number. A dedicated tracker can figure out what plane belongs to who, either by showing up at the airport, or by comparing flight logs with other information about celebrity locations.

      • aidan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        So you can still track them, because all flight plans are public and need to be for safety reasons, but they no longer have to tell you who owns what tail number.

        I feel like that has a little bit to do with how journalists tracked down a bunch of FBI shell companies that operated spy planes over BLM(and other) protests.

        • Flax@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          Why use spy planes? Why not just use police helicopters? Police helicopters are a normal sight above any large scale demonstration

          • aidan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            I have no clue, some claim its because they’re illegally using Stingrays(cell interceptors)

            • Flax@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              Basically everything is encrypted, they won’t be that useful. Maybe could perhaps identify who is there though? But depends