• morphballganon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    National polls don’t tell us much due to the electoral college.

    Whether AL is +2 Trump or +20 Trump has no impact on who wins.

    • laverabe@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s a good point. Are there any models out there that “compensate” for that? I know Nate Silver’s one has been popular but I don’t know if that factors in the electoral weighing.

        • laverabe@lemmy.worldOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          ah yeah, I had forgot about that. He was dead wrong in 2016 ;) I think he had Clinton at like 80% chance of winning, but I believe whatever errors they made back then were mostly corrected since.

          • krelvar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Silver isn’t with 538 anymore, I think his model and the 538 model have the same basis though, probably diverging a bit since he left?

            In any case, the point that an 80% chance of X is no guarantee of X got pounded home, don’t you think? :)