• Clbull@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    Gab tried to pull the same thing with their Dissenter plugin. It was such a bad idea that Mozilla and Google banded together to remove the extensions from their stores for ToS violations.

    Now imagine what a nightmare it would be to moderate the ability to comment on anything online with actual standards and decency.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Why was it a bad idea? Seems like a wonderful idea. Minus Gab.

      Some kind of web of trust and inheriting ignored users based on it and weights - and it will work.

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Not necessarily and only those you comment.

          That’s the point, to comment any webpage. It’s clear you visited it if you comment it.

          • treadful@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            19 hours ago

            Presumably it loads comments when you visit a page. That would send a request with the URL to whatever service they’re running.

            • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              18 hours ago

              Unless you make a p2p system and search comments by page hash in some way (maybe just over I2P?) making it hard for other nodes to understand from which node it comes and which node downloads those comments.

              OK, I agree. Not very good. But in theory it can be better.