• CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have suspected for a while it is astroturfing. Same as with GIMP and Libre Office where inevitably someone will trash the UI as it’s “soooo bad”. If you say a lie, and repeat it enough, people start to believe it.

    • million@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m a huge fan of open source but saying the only people saying Gimps UI is bad are astroturfing is insane.

      It’s famously controversial and uses UI paradigms that don’t exist in any modern desktop environments.

      • CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’m not, but it’s not like it’s an occasional thing. Every time it’s brought up, it’s trashed. Free software that does a better job than anything else free, and folk bash it. Either they like and are motivated by Adobe dominance, or they’re useful idiots.

        It’s balanced to say “great program, but could do with a UI improvement”. It isn’t to say it’s unusable because of UI. I cannot imagine any free software advocate should be proud of taking that line.

          • CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Tenacity, not audacity. Audacity got took over by a company with questionable record and tried to add telemetry into it. Tenacity was the OS fork which stayed true to principles.

            GIMP may not be your bag, but it’s highly used and many find it has much higher quality features than the alternatives. UI may not be popular, but it doesn’t prevent it being a solid bit of open source software.

            Btw, what steps have you taken to improve open source graphics software? It’s easy to bash, it’s harder to learn and contribute.

            Open source contributors > open source advocates > grateful open source users > almost everyone else > open source critics

            • GizmoLion@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              One doesn’t need to be a dev to have opinions about ease of use of a piece of software, don’t be dense.

              • CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                That is true, but to get free software made by people in their free time and say “this is rubbish” is a little ungrateful.

                “Here, have this free food…”. " ewww gross, that is so bad".

    • sab@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Every time I introduce someone to LibreOffice I half expect them to hate it, and that I’ll have to go through the alternative interfaces and try to make them accept it and potentially install OnlyOffice instead if that doesn’t help.

      Instead, I’m generally met with an “oh, this is nice”, before they start typing away.

      I get that some of the bigger nerds would prefer something different (I would personally love the power of LibreOffice inside a modern minimalist GTK app), but LibreOffice is working great for most users. Those passionate enough to see an issue with it probably prefer markdown or latex anyway.

      • argv_minus_one@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’ve only introduced LibreOffice to one person in recent memory, and her reaction was basically, “This is free?! I wish I knew about this years ago.”

      • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I honestly prefer LibreOffice to what Microsoft Office has become.

        When I went to grad school, I was told MS Office was required, so I purchased it, but turned out we just used basic word processing and a handful of simple presentations, so I ended up using LibreOffice for everything instead.

        • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Same here. I found the Microsoft ribbon they introduced in 2007 to be a major anti pattern. It didn’t make things easier, it made things way harder. Our IT department tried to bust me for not using the official Microsoft software (outlook, excel, word, etc) so I outright uninstalled windows and put fedora on there. Granted, I was trying to do partitions and fucked it up, but whatever. The point is I wanted to get away from their “antivirus” spyware so I could use what worked for me. I got the idea when I saw the Dean of academics was using i3 as her window manager

    • Millie@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I love GIMP’s UI. It’s clean, it’s to the point, and it’s stayed basically the same for ages!

      • CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Damn, this positivity isn’t welcome in free software circles! How can I respect you? (Kidding, I think you and your positivity is awesome.)

      • CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m involved in open source software, and of the artists I’m aware of, most use GIMP, not Krita, because it has better features. Krita is a great option, but it doesn’t quite have the same features for producing quality art.

    • Landrin201@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Other people who have bad experience ces with something just be asteoturfing.”

      Ivw consistently had an issue with Firefox that I described in a thread a few days ago that I can’t seem to identify or fix. Am I just not allowed to mention it?

      • CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maybe their issue tracker is the best bet, or in a separate question thread about the issues. Raising it in every thread it comes up when people recommending it isn’t going to solve the issue or help anything, is it?

        • Landrin201@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          No, it won’t. I bring it up in this particular thread for 2 reasons.

          1. I don’t like the insinuation that anyone who claims to have problems with Firefox must be bots. I don’t think that’s at all true, since I’ve run into multiple problems with the browser myself that I haven’t been able to solve.

          2. I brought it up in the previous thread because I think that if people are considering switching, knowing what problems exist is useful. It isn’t meant to dissuade anyone, in fact I regularly recommend Firefox to my friends and family. But I don’t personally use it because of a pretty major problem, and I don’t think it’s bad to mention it when the topic comes up.

          • CrypticCoffee@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            “I don’t like the insinuation that anyone who claims to have problems with Firefox must be bots.”

            I did not say this, multiple people have interpreted it this way. It’s a little defensive. I said there is a targetted campaign against it where every time it is brought up it is trashed. You may be be a genuine person who is also trashing it, but that doesn’t mean there isn’t also a targetted campaign at play. I just find it hard to believe that some folk hate FOSS projects so much they have to smash it every time it’s brought up. Sounds exhausting.

            There is a difference between “it’s great software, but i’ve notice a few issues” and “this project is trash”. The second is posted purely with the intent of trying to dissuade people from using it, and all they do is keep people using Chrome, which I think we can all agree has bigger issues.