• calamityjanitor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Another aspect is the social graph. It’s targeted for normies to easily switch to.

    Very few people want to install a communication app, open the compose screen for the first time, and be met by an empty list of who they can communicate with.

    https://signal.org/blog/private-contact-discovery/

    By using phone numbers, you can message your friends without needing to have them all register usernames and tell them to you. It also means Signal doesn’t need to keep a copy of your contact list on their servers, everyone has their local contact list.

    This means private messages for loads of people, their goal.

    Hey, we know this account sent this message and you have to give us everything you have about this account

    It’s a bit backwards, since your account is your phone number, the agency would be asking “give us everything you have from this number”. They’ve already IDed you at that point.

    • Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Yep, at that point they’re just fishing for more which, hey, why wouldn’t they.

      It’s a give and take for sure, requiring a real phone number makes it harder for automated spam bots to use the service, but at the same time, it puts the weight of true privacy on the shoulders and wallets of the users, and in a lesser way, incentives the use of less than reputable services, should a user want to truly keep their activities private.

      And yeah, there’s an argument to be made for keeping crime at bay, but that also comes with risks itself. If there was some way to keep truly egregious use at bay while not risking a $10,000 fine on someone for downloading an episode of Ms. Marvel, I think that would be great.