• Cyberspark@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Their next game will be better, 5e held them back as much as its recognition boosted it’s popularity. WotC will spend the next decade chasing the success of BG3 while these guys rinse and repeat as they always have.

    There’s no reason to believe there was anything special about BG3 other than any WotC funding and lore.

    • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 months ago

      WotC funding? Reverse that, Larian had to pay WotC for the right to be able to make a baldur’s gate game. This has been confirmed by Larian.

      • Cyberspark@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        That’s dumb and makes what they did all the more incredible. They would have done better if they’d done their own thing. Though it definitely wouldn’t have been as popular. But people will learn this as WotC goes back to wasting the IP rushing out flops.

    • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      There’s no reason to believe that there was anything special about one of the highest reviewed games of all time?

          • Cyberspark@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Bigger budget means more people and more time which let you spend more time on the little details. They were capable of BG3 after D:OS2, whether they did it or not. They’re still capable of it. There’s nothing special about the BG IP that means they can’t make a game of similar quality in any other setting.

            • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              There’s more than little details that I appreciate in BG3 over D:OS2, but I think that’s just a team that got better at their craft.

      • Cyberspark@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Something being popular doesn’t mean it’s good just as something being unpopular doesn’t mean it’s bad. I’m not saying it’s not better than their other titles, but there’s nothing specifically remarkable about the BG IP that made it better than if it were in any other setting.

        • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Ah, that reads a little different than your previous comment. Yeah, I’m looking forward to what they do next, but especially given that this was their best game yet, I definitely don’t agree that they were held back in any way.