mox@lemmy.sdf.org to Programming@programming.dev · 2 days agoThe empire of C++ strikes back with Safe C++ proposalwww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square53fedilinkarrow-up1196arrow-down12cross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.secpp@programming.dev
arrow-up1194arrow-down1external-linkThe empire of C++ strikes back with Safe C++ proposalwww.theregister.commox@lemmy.sdf.org to Programming@programming.dev · 2 days agomessage-square53fedilinkcross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.secpp@programming.dev
minus-squareFizzyOrange@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·6 hours agoThe biggest issue is move constructors. Explanation here: https://cxx.rs/binding/cxxstring.html#restrictions Probably seems like a little thing but I found it quite annoying in practice, and there are other things like not being able to combine serde-derive and cxx FFI on the same struct.
The biggest issue is move constructors. Explanation here: https://cxx.rs/binding/cxxstring.html#restrictions
Probably seems like a little thing but I found it quite annoying in practice, and there are other things like not being able to combine serde-derive and cxx FFI on the same struct.