• sunbeam60@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m deeply against this ridiculous proposal.

    But scanning of messages already happens, tbf, for spell checking, emoji replacement, links to known infectious sites.

    Photo copiers do client side scanning to prevent copying of money.

    There are precedents.

    I hate this proposal. But let’s be straight about the facts: The phone has full access to everything you send and receive already. This isn’t the same as having an encryption back door.

    • possibly a cat@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      There are precedents, but we can forego these if we want. I don’t have to use Google’s keyboard. I can even degoogle my phone with Graphene OS. Some black boxes remain of course but they are small and relatively secure. Meanwhile a client-side scanner is adding an unavoidable increase to the attack surface. That’s a weakened security environment. And not just for your cat videos, but for journalists and others dealing with sensitive materials.

      I can’t wait to see how many horrible implementations devs come up with because this feature provides no value for their employers.