• chris.@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      right? the more that comes out about oceangate, the more baffled i am that this is a real company that actually generated revenue; i mean the context & details surrounding this story have become ironic enough to be almost cartoonish at this point. even the name of the company in itself seems like some sort of foreshadowing (well, if we’re going by past uses of the -gate suffix)

      • floofloof@lemmy.caOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        They weren’t a profitable company though, according to the late CEO. And the sub imploded on its 5th voyage.