• FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    We’re talking about an organization that refuses to retrofit their ships with seatbelts despite who-knows-how-many crew members dying every week from getting tossed out of their chairs in a fight or when anything unexpected happens.

    Also… surge protection… just saying.

    • Noxy@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 month ago

      or figure out why terminals and displays need literal plasma to power them! surely they don’t need that much damn energy.

      • ummthatguy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        Or perhaps, they could devise a means to run the plasma currents into an alternative rechargeable source separate of critical systems. Sure it may result in an extra maintenance cycle, but just maybe, it’s worth the effort.

        • Noxy@yiffit.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          Starfleet desperately needs an occupational safety division. Hell, maybe if they focus a little more on efficiency, The Burn might not happen!

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Security cameras are in fact very vital aspects of a security theater. Sure they won’t stop someone from breaking in, but they’ll definitely allow one to monitor much larger areas than would otherwise be possible.

        The caveat is they can’t be ignored and need to be monitored. And given how dumb the ship’s computer is….well. Probably should assign a Vulcan flunky.

        • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 month ago

          I was more thinking of all the times they had to search 3 entire decks of the ship for a lifesign that was feint or deliberately obscured, probably could have found the thing they were looking for inside 5 minutes if they had some damn cameras.

          • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 month ago

            Ah. Yeah. That makes sense.

            Also, door alarms. Like modern RFID or NFC door systems are capable of reporting in real time someone swiping a badge- a failed badge swipe (ie if someone is trying to get into someone’s room,) or even a threshold of “x-many failed swiped”- and perhaps more importantly; when a door gets forced open (or is otherwise open when it shouldn’t be. Including held open for “too long”)

            The most secured facilities, even just using modern equipment would have lock downs checking biometrics, a badge, and probably some kind of password (and a duress code to use instead of a password,)

          • mkwt@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 month ago

            Or the number of times someone can ditch all of the ship’s tracking systems, on a military vessel, just by leaving their badge somewhere.