• ch00f@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 hours ago

    But the sample size is 15 people. Do you trust cherry picking 15 people out of thousands a good way to judge national trends?

    • Dupree878@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I believe it’s just as accurate. Especially with the way the poll questions are phrased

      • ch00f@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 hours ago

        You do understand that there are thousands of comments on these posts and they’re selecting 10 or so to write an article, right? Do you think cherry picking 10 people who are upset illustrates any kind of trend? Can’t you see how this article is disingenuous ?

        • Dupree878@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          The article, yeah. But observing social media anecdotally provides much more than 15 examples of those who believe this way. Then I can correlate that with what I know from the people I’m actually around every day, and the words of the minister on TV Sunday mornings warning about changing your DNA with vaccines to his 1500 member congregation.

          I’m just saying it seems no less accurate than a poll, and is unfiltered by biased questions