Espiritdescali@futurology.todayM to Futurology@futurology.todayEnglish · 1 month agoNew powder that captures carbon could be ‘quantum leap’ for industrywww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square14fedilinkarrow-up133arrow-down15cross-posted to: world@quokk.au
arrow-up128arrow-down1external-linkNew powder that captures carbon could be ‘quantum leap’ for industrywww.theguardian.comEspiritdescali@futurology.todayM to Futurology@futurology.todayEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square14fedilinkcross-posted to: world@quokk.au
minus-squareA_A@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·edit-21 month agoPlants are many other of magnitude better than this. Consider this result they got (and how expensive it must be) : from : https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-08080-x
minus-squaremonogram@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-21 month agoYes, Rock Stored Carbon is less impactful compared to say Land Stored Carbon (Biomass burial, Paulownia, Bamboo) Good thing there are people working on all different Carbon Capture methods.
minus-squareA_A@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agohuh ? Jup Rock ? … is this chalk ? (we do know most carbon on Earth is stored in rocks … maybe we could call them carbonate rocks ?)
Plants are many other of magnitude better than this.
Consider this result they got (and how expensive it must be) :
from :
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-08080-x
Yes, Rock Stored Carbon is less impactful compared to say Land Stored Carbon (Biomass burial, Paulownia, Bamboo)
Good thing there are people working on all different Carbon Capture methods.
huh ? Jup Rock ? … is this chalk ?
(we do know most carbon on Earth is stored in rocks … maybe we could call them carbonate rocks ?)
See edit