The first sentence on the Wikipedia page for it calls it “a disputed medical condition.” Even the CIA itself has admitted that cases are not caused by “a sustained global campaign by a hostile power.” The State Department similarly released a report that it was highly unlikely the symptoms were caused by any sort of directed energy weapon. In fact, seven different US intelligence agencies released a consensus statement saying, “available intelligence consistently points against the involvement of US adversaries in causing the reported incidents.”

But the clowns on .world don’t care about things like truth or evidence, or even direct statements from the people who’s boots they have in their mouths. If it makes an enemy of the US look bad, then it is absolute truth, and anything short of complete faith and loyalty must be purged from conversation.

Rare video clip of a .world mod

Offending post

  • FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Your comment was probably removed because first of all you extremely far from any sort of politness.

    Second of all you clearly fail to acknowledge that there have been multiple people disabled by something, we don’t know what. Whether or not it is some pathophysiological illness because of spy weapons, or something completely unrelated, we don’t know, but it’s indisputable that a large number of people were disabled in the same place in a similar timeframe by… somthing.

    • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      No, we know it’s not the result of some literally physics defying sci fi weapon.

    • OBJECTION!@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Your comment was probably removed because first of all you extremely far from any sort of politness.

      Then the mods should’ve listed that as the reason for removal.

      but it’s indisputable that a large number of people were disabled in the same place in a similar timeframe by… somthing.

      It actually is disputable, seeing as it’s, you know, “a disputed medical condition.” Yeah, some people had some symptoms, but what constitutes Havana Syndrome was always incredibly broad and vague, to the point that anything anyone experienced could be chalked up to it. It’s nothing but a socially constructed catch-all category for an array of pre-existing health conditions, responses to environmental factors, and stress reactions that were lumped under a single label.

      That is, by the way, verbatim from a scientific paper about it.