• Victor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 hours ago

    One could argue that you can be poor/abused anywhere. But there’s a clear difference in quality of life here.

    Very true. You’ve captured my exact sentiment here.

    And also, the very fact that you can be poor even in rich countries is an even greater failure of the system. Nobody in a “rich” country should be impoverished. There are plenty of resources there to take care of everyone as long as we all work together. But the system rewards only those who work for themselves.

    • untorquer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Hell, no one in the world would need to work more than 10hr a week if it was our goal and we just decided to equitably and efficiently share resources.

      • Victor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        That would be pretty sweet if accurate. Just satisfy the bare necessities and be free the rest of the time. Exploring other topics, for fun and benefit.

        • untorquer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          If we can supply this many people with the basics necessary for survival and work under our current extractive systems, and these systems concentrate resources in the wealthy few, then we clearly have enough to raise the standard of living worldwide. All the while reducing individual labor requirements,