source

ht to @hilljam@mastodon.social

    • jlow (he/him)@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      So the axis with the year isn’t actually 0 pr something else? Its just how much revenue was made in total (2000s were the time with most revenue) and how much each media contributed in a funky way of displaying it?

      • sqgl@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It would have been less confusing to have vertical lines rather than an x axis however they wanted it to look like a soundwave. However even though I am an electronic musician who works with soundwaves I didn’t notice the metaphor until reading the comment here.

      • flora_explora@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Thanks for pointing that out. It is a bit like the distribution on a violin plot then. But it still is weird how the colors are distributed and albeit I think it does indeed look nice, I think this plot shouldn’t be in this community…

      • Masimatutu@lemm.eeOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t know how to but this more clearly. The distance between the top and the bottom of the coloured strip at any given year; the thickness; represents the annual revenue.

        This is actually a pretty common format for representing the evolution of parts in a total, because you can clearly see the share, the combined revenue and the total revenue over the years (that’s the area). It is just that this one has been made symmetrical because it is easier to follow and just more pretty.