This is an article from itsfoss. Why read a copelied version here when we can read the full original version here: https://itsfoss.com/why-use-nixos/

The more you use Nix, the more you realize how limited the language is. Yes, it is really easy to read, and you probably don’t even need prior experience in functional languages, but after seeing how there’s Python, Shell and Ruby script inside the NixOS/nixpkgs repo for automation, like for example, this update.py for Vim, I wish they had used either Haskell, Erlang or at least some variant of ML, Lisp or Scheme instead. No, I don’t hate NixOS, and I’ll still probably stick to using it on my current laptop, but for my new future machine, I’ll be making the switch to Guix after learning the language.

I tried allready, the concept is solid, but nix language is incredibly frustrating, you spend too much time to find even package names, config options, to read documentation, to improve your configuration overall lol, you just do weird Linux, not things. I even found there is a Snowflake OS, which try to make it user-friendly, it even successes to some extend, yet it is questionable and limited, it hides things you should learn instead.

I find it hard to rate it positively, I see additional work and problems to solve things that have never been a problem for me. The last points are especially worthless with distrobox.

Of all the articles to copy and paste without attribution, you chose this one…?

I find the concept of NixOS to be incredibly cool, and in terms of immutable operating systems it would in theory be one that I’m really interested in!

But the last time I tried it, I found that I was constantly fighting the system, and the documentation is all over the place and confusing. There’s things like “Oh hey use Flakes!” but then most of the documentation doesn’t really cover Flakes because it’s still considered experimental, yet it feels like the majority of the community uses it.

I also had software that would just randomly break, and when trying to track down the changes from Nixpkgs I couldn’t find anything that would prompt why it broke. Which… seems counterproductive to one of the strong points of Nix.

One example I ran into, is OpenRazer - the service is no longer being exposed and was reported 7 months ago. I did my best to try to track down the changes that broke it, but I suspect it’s possibly a lower level change outside of the OpenRazer package/module that caused it to break.

I get the impression that if I wanted to try to fix it, I’d have to take on the massive gauntlet of understanding how all of NixOS’ internals work, and while yes someday I’d love to have a better understanding, right now I’m more focused on just making sure the things I’d like (or even need in some cases, like software for my job) just works.

all articles that have a headline like that means it’s bullshit. …even if it’s not bullshit.

I love NixOS

I’ve been ripe for testing nix out for a while now, and I’m super excited. I just don’t have a machine to test it on first, and I absolutely hate dual booting. If I have energy one day maybe I’ll setup a VM to test it out in. I’m really hopeful to have it as my main daily driver os especially for its portability and stability.

deleted by creator