• lntl@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s a common issue with arguments like this: no plan for implementation.

    In life, it’s easy to point out the problems. Much harder to develop solutions, even harder to implement them.

    Don’t do what is easy, play on hard mode. Play to win

    • unfreeradical@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Your objection is dishonest.

      I never expressed any intention to implement a construction company.

      You asked how someone else ought to implement a construction company.

      What answer might you expect, other than it’s not my business?

      You see, business is private, not public. Your question is meaningless with respect to the context, of supporting the public interest.

      • lntl@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Agriculture is also a private business. You’re making less sense now than you were a moment ago.

        • unfreeradical@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I am sorry you are struggling so much with your comprehension of concepts.

          I will try to make the matter completely plain.

          Agriculture is a practice for land utilization, involving labor, to produce food.

          Business is a social structure, within which workers, through utilizing a productive asset claimed as the private property of the business, and through providing their labor to the business, create a product whose sale generates a profit for the business owner.

          Agriculture may occur within the context of a private business, by utilizing lands claimed as its private property, to produce food for sale, through the labor provided by workers.

          Accordingly, a private business may generate a profit by the sale of food, produced through utilizing lands claimed as its private property, and through the labor provided by workers.

          Now, please pay very close attention.

          Business may create a product not through utilizing land, and even may create a product that is not food.

          Even more remarkably, agriculture may occur outside of private business, and may even occur utilizing lands not claimed as private property.

          In summary, all of the following are true…

          1. Some agriculture is through a business.
          2. Some business is agricultural.
          3. Some business is not agricultural.
          4. Some agriculture is not through business

          Hopefully, you are now beginning to understand the concepts that you previously have experienced as elusive and confounding.

          If not, then I doubt anyone can help you further, except to suggest that you reread in a few days after letting your thoughts settle.

          If you cannot respond to my explanation constructively, then please take your trolling elsewhere.