• unfreeradical@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Private property is a social construct, and no more.

    Some societies hold the construct, others lack it.

    Interaction with the natural environment requires simply agency and activity, not any particular social construct or system.

    Some system of management is required for members of society to benefit collectively from the same resources, but private property is not required.

      • unfreeradical@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        No. Sorry.

        Private property is not a concept that coherently describes the behaviors of rats.

        Private property is a social construct that occurs in some but not all human societies.

        Modern society, organized by the capitalist mode of production, produces the class disparity through private property.

        Socialists seek the abolition of private property, and thereby, the eradication of the class disparity.

          • unfreeradical@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Sharing is a general description of a robust, essentially universal, human behavior.

            As a general tendency, it also appears within the behavior of many other species.

            You have been invoking unconventional terminology, and now have descended essentially into incoherence.