• alyqz@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    1 day ago

    I imagine that the momentum would be conserved. So if the rifle normally shot a 30 gram ball at 300 meters per second, it would shoot a 5 kilogram ball at around 23 meters per second.

    • The larger size and lower speed of the cannon ball would likely reduce the range.
    • The larger size of the projectile would spread out the impact causing reduced damage.
    • The ballistics would be significantly different making it far harder to hit with.

    This is how I would do it in my game:

    • Reduce the damage from 1d12 to 1d10
    • Change piercing type to bludgeoning
    • Reduce range from 40/120 to something like 20/60
    • Add knockback of 5 ft to medium targets or 10 for small

    The really neat thing would be shooting non standard rounds that wouldn’t be possible from a musket like incendiary or smoke rounds.

    • Webster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      This exact mechanic is present in the Misborn book series. I don’t want to give spoilers because I recommend the books so highly, but I love the hard science nature of the way the magic system interacts with physics.

        • 9bananas@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          the books are the mistborn trilogy by Brandon Sanderson, and it’s second trilogy; wax and wayne.

          the physics bit is central to both, but it’s a bigger focus in the second trilogy.

          highly recommend all of them!

          and for more wacky ideas…well, the entire rest of the cosmere series! especially tress of the emerald sea, which is largely standalone, but contains quite a bit of in-universe lore…

          • stray@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Ah, I wondered if it might have been a typo since “mistborn” seems like a more plausible word. I’ve been meaning to get around to Sanderson since forever, but I didn’t do any reading for the longest time, and I’ve been on a big sci-fi kick since starting up again because I’m mostly interested in stories that use novel premises to examine issues like human rights and the nature of consciousness/life, etc. I’ve felt like fantasy is too meaningless adventure-y? Not enough induction of personal growth. But I’m in the middle of The Magicians right now, and that’s really proving me wrong, and also there was Tehanu. That was a hard book to read because it was so real.

            Anyhow, thanks to you both.

    • cygnosis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      22 hours ago

      I think damage reduction would be even more than that. The damage a projectile does to a target is directly related to its kinetic energy which is calculated as e = ½mv². So when you increase mass but reduce velocity you also reduce the damage by the square of the difference in velocity (I think). As long as the damage just relies on the physics of the projectile and not magic, that is.

      • alyqz@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        I was assuming that the total energy would be maintained (In this case 1350 joules) and thus the damage should be the same if weren’t spread out. It has been 20+ years since I has to do any of that math so I could be wrong about any of that. And since the only paper that was handy happened to be an envelope I guess it was technically back of the envelope math. :)