Pointing out inconsistencies, fallacies, and weaknesses ain’t a troll.
Pretty funny that you believe you did any of that. Not shocking that you default to the standard troll moves, pretty lazy if you ask me, but funny regardless.
Nowadays everybody wants to talk like they got something to say but nothing comes out when they move their lips just a bunch of gibberish.
Pointing out inconsistencies, fallacies, and weaknesses ain’t a troll.
Pretty funny that you believe you did any of that. Not shocking that you default to the standard troll moves, pretty lazy if you ask me, but funny regardless.
You need to develop self restraint and recognize that your world view must hold up to scrutiny otherwise your belief is a lie if you don’t allow rebuke and correction.
As I stated, I am not here to debate your ignorant thoughts. You should probably take your own advice 9 day old troll.
You asked a question, I answered it. Not here to debate your ignorant thoughts.
I have searched for the philosophy behind such a label but terms like “far right” seem only exist as a pejorative by conformists for superficial reasons.
"Far-right politics, often termed right-wing extremism, encompasses a range of ideologies that are typically marked by radical conservatism, authoritarianism, ultra-nationalism, and nativism.[1] This political spectrum situates itself on the far end of the right, distinguished from more mainstream right-wing ideologies by its opposition to liberal democratic norms and emphasis on exclusivist views. Far-right ideologies have historically included fascism, Nazism, and Falangism, while contemporary manifestations also incorporate neo-fascism, neo-Nazism, white supremacism, and various other movements characterized by chauvinism, xenophobia, and theocratic or reactionary beliefs. "
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Far-right_politics
You didn’t search very hard.
Calling things like Fascism and white supremacy “superficial reasons” to label someone “far right” speaks volumes about you.
Go preach your bull shit elsewhere.
Maybe in the future you can do your own research instead of using the comment box as a search engine.
Imagine if the author came out and simply said “What the Likud party is doing is wrong on every level and must be stopped”.
Imagine doing that instead of saying Hamas is justified in their actions by painting a narrative around the US occupying Canadian land and asking us to imagine “what Canadians would do”.
Speaks volumes about the people pushing such a narrative.
What more should be done to give him “help” other than the free time needed to seek it, no pay cut which allows him to pay for it, and no consequences for breaking the law he was tasked to enforce?
He is suspended with pay.
Business as usual.
Fuck the Police.
The only people who care are already against dictatorships.
Stop calling it “Trump style”. It already has a name that everyone knows and it is called Fascism.
What makes you think an AGI wouldn’t need our species in some way?
He explicitly stated during his testimony that he knows the names of Conservative MPs who are compromised, both past and present.
It would be helpful if we started calling the “playbook” out for what it actually is.
This is the Fascist play book being used by the right wing globally to establish theocratic dictatorships. Even with countless books on the subject, pointing the tactics out explicitly, people still fall for the same shit that has seen countless dictators gain power.
Which is why it is so important to call out this non sense for what it actually is. Fascism is alive and well, gaining more ground daily, and needs to be spoken about in the most blunt way possible.
I was under the impression that the Liberals, specifically Trudeau, are so corrupt we need an election this very moment to save Canada.
Weird how suddenly the “most corrupt Prime Minister in Canadian history” has a moral obligation to continue being the “most corrupt Prime Minister in Canadian history”.
They are call “Cons” for a reason and it isn’t because of a shortened party name.
What is best for the party is using their time to pass legislation that benefits Canadians enough to make them want to vote Liberal again.
Anyone who thinks this is all about the PM is drinking what Pierre is selling. If the Liberals showed real results on the files that actually matter to the people of Canada, Pierre wouldn’t have a leg to stand on.
It would seem, based on polling data, that a majority are drinking the Conservative kool-aid and support Pierre winning the next election. Which runs contrary to your main point.
I never said “bringing down the Government” would help keep Pierre out. I said if the Liberal MPs actually felt strongly they would take strong actions instead of wasting everyone else’s time and handing Pierre ammunition to use against the Liberal party as a whole.
If Pierre’s history in Canadian politics cannot stop the fucker, a random new Liberal leader won’t do it either.
All this letter did is give the MPs something for their constituents to demonstrate “at least I tried”. This is nothing but MPs desperately clinging to their jobs, not desperately trying to stop the Conservative party from winning the next election.
If they cared about the latter they would be working on things that would make problems in Canada better, which is the Conservatives whole “platform”, not wasting time trying to oust the PM.
They need to stop wasting time on party politics.
If they want to keep their jobs they should work on making their constituents happy enough to elect them again.
If the MPs are serious about this they should leave the party, sit as independents, and vote against the Government on a confidence motion.
If Trudeau is so bad it is time to nut up or shut up.
In order to use any service provided by Meta one has to already have their head in the sand and pants around their ankles.
Asking for mindfulness in the face of the latest “moral dilemma” posed by Meta is simply not something the user base seems capable of.