I’m an anarchocommunist, all states are evil.

Your local herpetology guy.

Feel free to AMA about picking a pet/reptiles in general, I have a lot of recommendations for that!

  • 9 Posts
  • 214 Comments
Joined 5 years ago
cake
Cake day: November 25th, 2019

help-circle








  • Adding the second sink lets you easily route the audio through one, if I run that command I have it setup like this

    pactl load-module module-combine-sink sink_name=‘Game’ slaves=‘easyeffects_sink’

    and then I have a sink named “game” that I can record from OBS that isolates my audio from the one called game, but also passes that to my speakers, just seems like an easier way to do what you’re trying to accomplish with the wireplumber thing. I don’t know about if it’s the “proper” way but it works for me!


  • pactl load-module module-combine-sink sink_name='(namehere)' slaves='(put the sink you want to duplicate here)'

    Then there will be another sink that’s the exact same as the one you set as a slave that you can play audio to and that OBS can record separately, as for getting something to automatically go to that stream, generally you can use this environment variable:

    PULSE_SINK='(sinknamehere)'

    and make a .desktop file or keyboard shortcut that launches the program with that

    you can also make the sink names consistent with something like this but adapted to your audio devices in your wireplumber conf:

    monitor.alsa.rules = [
    	{
    		matches = [
    		{
    			device.name = "~alsa_card.pci-0000_06_00.*"
    		}
    		]
    		actions = {
    			update-props = {
    				device.name = "alsa_card.pci-0000_06_00"
    				node.nick = "Speakers"
    			}
    		}
    	}
    		{
    		matches = [
    		{
    			device.name = "~alsa_card.usb-Creative_Technology_Ltd_Sound_Blaster_X4*"
    		}
    		]
    		actions = {
    			update-props = {
    				device.name = "alsa_card.usb-Creative_Technology_Ltd_Sound_Blaster_X4"
    				node.nick = "Headphones"
    			}
    		}
    	}
    ]
    
    












  • Communist@lemmy.mltoScience Memes@mander.xyzsnek id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I can’t see the paper on that page, just the image, is there more to it than just the image and the claim?

    What snakes have they checked?

    edit: I think this is really about identifying rattlesnakes, more than about identifying venomous snakes in general. There’s two counterexamples on the “anal scale” page of wikipedia

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anal_scale

    the undivided end on an elapid venomous snake, and the divided on a colubrid


  • Communist@lemmy.mltoScience Memes@mander.xyzsnek id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    It’s not even an indicator, there’s places where the opposite is true, this is like the myth of the vertical slit pupils meaning they’re venomous, there’s no actual correlation, this just coincidentally works in areas with few snake species, but you’d have to know that ahead of time, and since there’s few species wherever this does work, you might as well just learn what the venomous snakes look like so this is practically completely useless.

    This usually happens when somebody learns that in their local area this rule applies, and then assumes it applies everywhere.