Courant d'air 🍃

Je comprends les bas-votes pour la manière un peu maladroite dont c’est amené et le titre un peu extrême, mais en lisant tout l’article on comprend que c’est pas aux personnes équipées de quéquettes qu’il s’attaque mais à la construction sociale de la masculinité.

Cela dit il laisse sous-entendre que cette construction est embrassée par 100% des hommes et ça je suis pas d’accord. J’admet qu’il y a du chemin à faire et que même ceux qui pensent être déconstruits à 100% se trompent souvent, mais la place de la virilité dans l’éducation et bien moindre qu’autrefois, au point que j’aime à penser qu’une part des hommes ne s’y identifie plus du tout.

Selon moi cette part-là ne voit pas de rapport de domination et ne pourra pas dériver vers cette extrême-là.

https://observatoiremediaecologie.fr/

Tu peux cross-poster sur !environnement@jlai.lu si tu veux !

I’m tHe KiNg oF THe wOrLd

Just made the transition, couldn’t be easier. Export, import, profit

Ahem, you know, on the high seas 🏴‍☠️

I just watched the Stutterer short film, really well written and directed, it made me shed a small tear at the end 🥲

“C’est la vie” hahaha yeah radioactive shit happens

I love your style, keep going!

Mocking someone who would edge over picture of men then jizz over a woman picture is kind of biphobic.

I may have misunderstood, English is not my native language

I was speaking about the comment they deleted

Thank you, the first comment you wrote missed a homophobic remark, this one is better

I’m not sure we have the same definition of NSFW… I just don’t want to see this kind of stuff if I haven’t chosen to. The same applies for gore or shocking images, not just sexually explicit content.

Great art but should be tagged NSFW

Edit: wow, I was not aware that the NSFW tag was such a big deal.

Just to clarify: NSFW doesn’t mean I cannot refrain from masturbating at what I see, it just means I don’t want to see this without first clicking on a blurry image. Everyone has their own sensitivity and it’s sad to see not everyone respect that.

I don’t want to debate on that all day and I’m not moderating this community (plus, this post comes from one of the moderators so I’m sure they know how to deal with it) so do whatever you want with it.

How do they know they weren’t taking off? Maybe they were able to fly without wings!

Awesome fact btw

To sum up the other comments:

Don’t worry it’s nothing.

PS: if you don’t have a professional do something about it quickly your house will explode.

That’s why I stopped asking / reading answers about this kind of stuff on forums, and have a professional come and see to give me a real advice. Every case is different and reading random advices on the internet can bring a lot of anxiety. Especially if you decide to do nothing while some people told you that it could be really bad.

We have a winner!

• Big endian (a very powerful NPC)
• Hardware abstraction (a spell that makes all the stuff disappears)
• Obfuscation (invisibility spell)
• Multiplexing (ability to cast several spells as one)
• Dangling reference (when wrong information is given by somebody)
• Curiously Recurring Template Pattern (basically crop circles)
• Pure virtual method (anything somebody learned but will never use)
• Diamond inheritance (when someone in the party dies and all of their money is spread accross the others)

Can you tell what’s my job?

This sounds like fantasy indeed

The first thing I though seeing the image is “it looks a lot like Stålenhag”. Yep indeed, sounds gorgeous

How can it be IMAX? Isn’t the whole point of (real) IMAX movies to be captured on analog IMAX cameras and projected on analog film?

Can’t wait to see it btw, seems nice