Ugh, I want to say old internet things, but I kinda like this place and don’t wanna get banned :,(
Ugh, I want to say old internet things, but I kinda like this place and don’t wanna get banned :,(
I mean, isn’t that a legitimate concern considering how many privacy focused services are built on top of / around TOR?
Naw, it really costs an hour and 40 min of your life and probably a few thousand brain cells.
Oh no, now we have to ban them all?? What a shame!
/s
Yeah, its like someone tried to convert a Toyota pickup into a 2-door jeep.
I’m actually really down with this concept.
Imma need the stats on this so I can throw it in someone’s face later.
Yeah, as someone who grew up in a VERY right wing household (and has made the transition to a much more liberal point of view), it kills me seeing the left make the same logical fallacies bad arguments to fear monger against the right as the right would use against the left.
Edit: probably over thinking my own wording. Its probably not a logical fallacy to assume your enemy is united, its just an inaccurate argument. Changed comment to maybe better reflect that.
Based on my (probably wrong) math, either a penny or, like a 2 cent coin (those existed at some point, right?).
So the ratio of old money to new money is approximately .25 to 4.50, which means that the value of money has shrunk by a factor of about 18.
25 cents over 18 yields ~1.38 cents.
So if he took a penny, cut it into thirds, taped one of those thirds to another penny, and was able to flip that unbalanced mess, you could say he’d lost a modern quarter’s worth of value.
It kills me because this seems to be the way that leftists seems to view the right.
So what I’m hearing is that we just need to selectively breed people to have smaller penises so we can just use chicken intestines for condoms instead?
I don’t think so. But I think that that’s going to vary a lot based on how you want to measure “badness for the climate”.
My instinct is to look at Feed to Gain Ratio, which is the measure of food eaten to weight gained. This will vary animal to animal based on the animal’s purpose (meat cows vs dairy cows, meat lambs vs wool sheep, etc) and the type of food they’re fed.
Still, there are reliable bands for estimating for each animal. According to This Article, it looks like sheep can fall into a 4:1 to 6:1 ratio while cows are closer to 12:1 (this is a bit higher than I was taught in high school biology, but not by much). Of course, the higher these numbers, the “worse” the animal is for the environment.
This, but un-sarcastically.
Would be an interesting boost to the Sheep industry.
Sorry, was definitely reading this 90% asleep as I rolled out of bed. Thanks for the extra link anyway.
Can you pass a link?
Are you implying you need to have Vermont in Vermont Curry?
Haven’t played Origins, but I’ve spent a lot of time with Odyssey which has my highest recommendation.
From a friend who’s opinion I trust, I’ve been told Origins is the less fleshed out version of Odyssey. He says that Origins started Assassin’s Creed on a new RPG focused track that really just worked for Origins and Odyssey (he claims they biffed Valhalla).
Is that God of War?
Yeah, I can’t get enough of them. I literally have my colonists buy it all when capybara meat is in stock.
#JustRimworldVibes
Like, I don’t want to sound like a corporate shill, but Valve has been the most consumer friendly corporation I’ve ever seen. Even if they do meet the criteria for a monopoly, they are the model of what a company that finds itself as The Monopoly should be, in my opinion.
I have no intent to sign up for this “lawsuit”, even though I stand to gain some $500 from it. I hope Steam lives long and prospers.