We’ve had flying cars for about 60 years. They’re called helicopters.
There is no record of this bio
We’ve had flying cars for about 60 years. They’re called helicopters.
You actually can run the engines in reverse. They have thrust reversers. There’s very good reasons that they do not reverse the plane from the stand using the engines, but it is possible.
If they made you forget, why would they admit to it on a sign? Does that make any sense whatsoever?
No iron clothes is a lie. They say no iron on the label in the store, but they tell you to iron in on the care label.
But symphony 45 really was written to resolve a labor dispute. That is true.
Roscosmos doesn’t consider clearing the launch tower to be a success. There is value in continuing to use proven technology.
The Soyuz is cheaper. Roscosmos is an objectively better rocket company.
Surely a fruit filled biscuit is another possibility.
The universe is not super precise, so it is a generalization, but within the solar system, planets orbit and revolve approximately in a plane.
The orbit of every planet in the solar system is within 8 degrees of the sun’s equator. With the exception of Uranus, every planet’s axial tilt is within 30 degrees of its orbital inclination.
The formation of solar systems results in most things settling into a mostly flat disk shape most of the time.
There is direction in space. Space is not a formless void there is order and structure to the universe.
The solar system is shaped like a disk. Most planets orbit and revolve to the same axis as the solar system.
When a star trek ship is seen in orbit, like the opening to TOS it is usually shown orbiting with the up of the ship facing the north of the planet, making a left turn with the planet off the port side.
Having a consistent orientation, like up=north would make sense for navigating a solar system. Federation ships in orbit are always shown rotating to face the direction of travel while in orbit. That’s not at all needed to remain in orbit, but having consistent orientation seems important to the federation.
Regardless of gender, your 30s is a perfect time to date cute single people who just finished their first divorce.
If ur 30+ you can have romantic moments with women, which is nice.
Research the fuses on the car. The smart systems or modem can most likely be disabled by removing power to them.
I brought up that flight to highlight the importance of these paper trails, as defective titanium can fail catastrophically.
The engine exploded “in part due to” the engine manufacturer’s failure in quality control, but also the airline’s maintenance department failing to find the fatigue cracks during maintenance checks.
Boeing was not involved in flight 232, the plane was a DC-10.
Pretty much yes. Proper documentation is important for safety, but calling the itself titanium fake is incredibly dishonest.
The rest of the headline doesn’t fair any better.
The planes that included components made with the material were… Boeing 737 Max and 787 Dreamliner airliners as well as Airbus A220 jets
Headline only mentions one of the involved manufacturers, misrepresenting it as a boeing problem because they know what will drive clicks.
The issue is not that the parts aren’t titanium, its that there isn’t a paper trail documenting the titanium.
This is an issue, because improperly forged titanium can have issues that makes it unsuitably weak for its intended purpose. Having documentation showing where the materials came from, when it was inspected for defects and when it was manufactured is critical for safety.
United flight 232 had an engine explode in part due to defective titanium. This is a real safety concern.
Though the headline says boeing, the article mentions these undocumented parts being found in airbus planes as well. Its an industry problem, not a Boeing specific one.
MCAS, (must crash airplane system,) the system that caused those crashes is present on all max variants. The involved aircraft were max 8’s because that was the first to enter production.
Every other max variant has the same system. Changes to, and knowledge of MCAS should prevent future crashes but this is an issue that affects every 737 max, despite only max 8’s crashing from it.
The meme shows only bikes with flat handlebars, like commuter bikes intended for transportation.
Every bike you posted are high performance racing bikes with specialized aerodynamic handlebars.
Different priorities. Triangless bikes with a top bar is not a good idea for commuter bicicles like the ones in the meme.
Imagine designing a bicycle without triangles. Every joint needs to be overbuilt, because there’s no structure from the geometry. But you make sure it still has a top tube, so its just as hard to mount and dismount as a normal bike. Incredible!
The piano for when dodecaphony doesn’t subvert tonality nearly enough.