Locking this down.

Too many heated comments

tsonfeir reported this comment because you quoted his comment, which broke community rules.

Same thing as fair use - you weren’t making the comment, you were arguing against the comment. Leaving it. tsonfeir can deal with the shame of his words.

Gave them a 7-day ban for that comment, plus trying to win an argument via reporting you.

There’s got to be easier ways…

b…bu…bu…but…

that’s just wrinkled blankets and sheets with extra steps

You posted it. Nobody on the internet lies. Ergo, it’s your trash.

“swish”

/s for those that need it

I’m your huckleberry

I use Fark daily, except for the days that the squirrel with big balls decides to get drunk (servers go down)

the modlogs show that we do take action, but only when justified. Just because you feel something is justified, that doesn’t mean you’re right.

A report doesn’t mean you’ll get what you want. Moderators will review the report, and see if it has merit.

Insulting us is the best way to make us do our job /s

I understood from the outset. Have a great day!

Ah yeah. Please explain how that is a personal attack. They surmised that something must be affecting your taste buds if you find that the two drinks taste the same. That would be an accurate summation if they feel the two taste very dissimilar.

I didn’t get personal. Sorry if you took it personally.

I actually agree with Treczoks about them not tasting remotely the same.

My wife gets the extra creamy oat milk. I can easily tell it’s not regular milk, and it’s just not for me. I honestly tried to like it.

That’s not me, though. I try to keep things civil. If you find it funny to fuck with people, that’s you. If it’s in a community I moderate, I’ll do what my rules say I do. Simple as that. I moderate because people ask for help in moderation, and I try to be fair about it. Some people take it personally, and that’s on them.

I have nothing against you or your views. I only moderate you when you break community rules. The modlog doesn’t lie.

No grudge. Just doing my job.

I’ll just leave this here.

Comments removed:

Comment: You just admitted to being suckered by someone you think is a troll -or- falsely accused someone of being a troll because you’re desperate to ‘win’ against an anonymous internet stranger. Thanks for the laughs- Bye, Felicia! [Rule 1]

Comment: >Right. You aren’t worth engaging with. If you believed that you’d just walk away. but you couldn’t help yourself- I’m in your head. Reeks of “need to win” desperation but I love that scent ;) [Rule 1]

Usually I’d wait for 3 violations, but you were trolling hard in that thread. I only gave a 1-day ban, but wow, I’m flattered that I got a post about me because of it.

It throws frozen lemons at your party, that heal on contact

Compelling speech is a violation of the first amendment.

Yeah, I wish they could force it, but they can’t. They might be able to come to an agreement between both parties that if the defendant did XYZ, the plaintiff would reduce damages by X amount.

I don’t see that happening, though.

Updated the comment with your recommendation. Yeah. I suck at writing.

He likely only got the job because he’s black so it evens out

That’s one reason you received a ban from !news@lemmy.world (Racism, as noted in the ban message).

Ate shit like you said. Tasted like your mother’s pussy.

That’s another reason you had a comment removed. Reason given: “Civility”

My address is your mum’s bedroom

That one caused a ban from !Funny@sh.itjust.works (reason given: “First rule of the community is Be Kind. Come back later and try again.”)

Your entire Modlog is on display, so don’t say “They’ll ban you without even telling you why”

Fascist: a far-right, authoritarian, ultranationalist political ideology and movement, characterized by a dictatorial leader, centralized autocracy, militarism, forcible suppression of opposition, belief in a natural social hierarchy, subordination of individual interests for the perceived good of the nation and/or race, and strong regimentation of society and the economy.

Yeah. Removing content that is offensive is being fascist…

As a DevOps Architect, let me make it simple:

With a single front-end, you have a bottleneck. If you have one domain (website) that everybody goes to to get to the front-end, that means that domain is the single point of failure.

In my line of work, we use load balancers and sub-domains to divide the work and provide resilience (High Availability), but at the end of the day, if the DNS for that site goes down, we’re down.

Also, as Jet mentioned, whomever whoever controls the domain (website) controls the content. You can’t have multiple groups controlling a single domain. Whomever buys it controls it. If they don’t like content, they could easily block access to it.

I’m oversimplifying the inner workings, so if you want more details, let me know.

EDIT: subtext called me out on my crap English. Have nobody to blame but myself. English is my first language.