All of this user’s content is licensed under CC BY 4.0.
So, are you saying that your claim is conjecture? Or, perhaps, simply anecdotal?
libertarians aren’t a thing
[Libertarians] are republicans that are too embarrassed to identify as such publicly
Be careful to not make hasty generalizations.
To be fair, Libertardians also care about lowering the age of consent!
Based on what are you making this claim?
being libertarian is only marginally less embarrassing [than being a Republican] anyway
What about libertarianism is embarrassing to you?
Except that a tablet sized screen is not accomplishing the same goal as proper visibility
I never said that I was specifically advocating for that as the only solution. All that matters is if the same end is accomplished. If it is indeed true that the safety of a vehicle is only maximized when objects are directly visible to the driver, then so be it. If not, that is an unnecessarily specific and restrictive regulation. And, in any case, regulating a limit, and letting the market work within it, accomplishes the same end with the benefit of freedom of choice. An equivalent example would be regulating the maximum allowed emissions for a vehicle rather than mandating a specific design of the engine, exhaust system, etc.
Why does it seem that so many of those who claim that they’re libertarians are not actually libertarians?
I personally prefer the solution that maximizes liberty. If both routes, ie regulating compensation for lack of vision and prohibition of that which causes the lack of vision, accomplish the same end, ie the ensurement of safety, I would choose for former, as it maximizes personal choice and freedom.
I had to shapeshift this smile on my face.
😆
This makes me wonder if there could be a regulation mandating front facing cameras on vehicles where vision is obstructed when moving at low speeds. Perhaps collision alert systems are sufficient. At any rate, there should probably be something that mandates some form of compensation for the lack of vision.
And Arch Linux instead of openSUSE Tumbleweed and Fedora 😊
ELI5 How come it seems now the old [wives’] tale of Vietnamese eating pets and now its immigrants into the USA?
That’s still a rather incomprehensible sentence.
ELI5 How come it seems now the old wise tale of Vietnamese eating pets and now its immigrants into the USA?
I don’t understand that sentence.
Idk why it’s not in the chart because they did talk about it in the debate. Maybe the chart isn’t intended to be exhaustive.
Thank you! Solved!
Thank you for the information! Perhaps that’s what this setting is:
I will disable it and report back.
EDIT (2024-09-09T22:09Z): @ccf@lemmy.world, unfortunately, with that setting disabled, I still am experiencing the stuttering.
Make it work, then make it better.
I really like this one. It’s borderline a mantra.
As a counter to perfectionism:
If it’s worth doing, then it’s worth doing poorly. [source: a reddit user]
From what landfill did you unearth this 2010 era edgy ignorant teen humor?