In my opinion it would be a disaster if you could receive compensation for future policy input, act on that input in office, and be immune simply because you were not in office when you received it.

Just prove he did or did not do it instead of whatever this nonsense take is.

This is the equivalent of suspecting one of two books to be containing Nazi propaganda because it has more pages in it.

I’m not saying you should not be suspicious of the content of Threads but using size as a metric for it seems nonsensical to a software dev.