I was about to feel attacked but then I remembered i collected seeds from “probably asters” yesterday

🤞

💯

Jones said he would move to a new studio, websites and social media accounts that were already set up.

Lawyers for the plaintiffs were too busy high-fiving over another set of seizable assets to respond prior to publication

I’m much the same way, and constantly trying to consciously be more inclusive in conversations

gif of an epic leaping high five goes here

(this reply added almost purely for comedic value because of the thread)

When we’re talking about the countable number of something, “fewer” is a more appropriate word to choose; when it’s more conceptual then “less” is a better option. A good way to recognize which to choose is by examining the prompting question. In the parent comment you replied to, the question was “how many guys?” which alludes to a set number. Had they asked “how much of this” then there’s not a way for us to know the count. As an example: I could have used fewer words for this reply but I would have to be less pedantic.

Great explanation! Good job! (💕)

Remember to move hornworms to your non-production/trap tomatoes to see more of them!

Looks like Dark Arthur forgot his wings

With fptp, other better leverage points exist than dividing progressive voting share at the top. That’s our opportunity (as I see it) to state that we would like to keep the progress we’ve made, however small it might be. Downballot races all the way down to town boards are how we can push the legislation and policies we wish to see signed into law to achieve further progress. Success there also allows for more leftist/progressive people to be the pool for presidential candidates.

what would it take for you to vote third party?

^ that was your question, and telling me my reasoning behind the answer I gave isn’t relevant to what it would take me to vote third party is farcical and asinine, and that’s being generous

Firmly agreed. Too many people I know forget that social progress is measured in inches and social regression is measured in yards (cm’s and m’s for our other friends). I’ll gladly vote “no backsliding” on the top line, knowing that I can keep pressuring for progress in the interim.

This doesn’t quite apply to me, since I live somewhere with RCV and gladly use it. But:

A third party that doesn’t waste my time by only running top-line candidates while ignoring every other aspect of the necessary political gains to achieve their goals. Especially when the planks of their platform are overwhelmingly in the hands of the house and senate and not in the purview of the one position for which they decided to lackadaisically run. A third party presidential win with no support in the legislature would doom any real progress that third parties could hope to achieve - giving us a figurehead with no means to enact their agenda would only dissuade voters from seeing future candidates as viable and locking us back into the same dichotomy.

Aukward

We sent this as a gif to our family to announce that we were having a child, with “life, uh, found a way”

Everyone should read Jello Biafra’s accounts about Pelosi from back in the day to put her statements in context.

Replicators first, please.

D…Dad?