• 0 Posts
  • 95 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 4th, 2023

help-circle



  • OhNoMoreLemmy@lemmy.mltoEurope@feddit.deParty summaries
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    18 days ago

    That’s not how it works.

    Parties are at the national level, and form alliances/blocks at the international level in order to get things done. These blocks shift and there is no guarantee that one party will continue to vote with a particular block.

    Pick a country. Generally, the political parties in that country will stand for local elections, national elections, and EU elections. At that point you can ask what their politics are. But EU wide parties aren’t a thing.






  • OhNoMoreLemmy@lemmy.mltosolarpunk memes@slrpnk.netwelp
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    25 days ago

    Not these ones. They’re automatically generated so the computer that creates them will already know what the string is meant to be. You don’t need human annotations to use these kinds of capcha as training data.

    This is just a road block. They’re designed to inconvenience spammers so you get less spam to delete.



  • OhNoMoreLemmy@lemmy.mltoScience Memes@mander.xyz✨️ Finish him. ✨️
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    29 days ago

    It’s worth saying that ml is in a very different position to most of academic publishing.

    All of the serious journals are free to publish and fully open access and a significant amount of publication includes enough code that things are mostly replicable. GitHub has done wonders for our field. Also many tech companies use publications as an indication of prestige and go out of their way to publish stuff.

    We’re still drowning in too many papers and 95% of everything is shit, but that’s every field really. Talking to musk on twitter is the not right place for a nuanced discussion about publication.





  • the UI conversation around git has been going on long enough (here included) that there has to have been a significant global productivity cost due to the lack of a better UI.

    I don’t think this is true.

    Git is ugly and functional.

    People love to complain about it being ugly, but it does what it’s meant to. If there was actually a persistent productivity hit from its interface, one of the weird wrappers would have taken off, and replaced it.

    But the truth is, those wrappers all seem to be written by people learning to use git in the first place, and just get abandoned once they get used to it.


  • It’s super hard to get involved as a UI person. If you’re a developer, you can just rock up to a project and fix bugs, and if you follow the coding style they’ll probably get accepted.

    If you want to successfully contribute as a UI person you have to convince a bunch of developers that you know what they should be doing better than they do. It basically never happens.




  • It’s a consequence of parliamentary sovereignty.

    Parliament can always dissolve itself and call an election, and it’s an important mechanism for getting rid of the government.

    The problem is that the prime minister also has a majority in parliament, and that means he can make parliament dissolve itself when he likes.

    This was actually a problem for Johnson. Initially, he didn’t have enough of a majority and it wasn’t clear he could call an election without Corbyn’s support.