Nice try Zuck

You expect me to be better than that?

All you did up above was exactly what you accused me of doing. I pointed out a fallacy (what were the other arguments exactly? Koch/Nazi? Yeah I didn’t mention them because the fallacy was the strongest part of their comment) and you created a false situation (that I “ran away” from something or other) and called that an ad hominem. Objectively incorrect.

Maybe a primer on Aristotelian logic might help you out… Unless of course you’d rather continue to dribble urine down your pant leg and present it proudly as a comment worth reading.

I expected better of Mort Pudland

Ah the ad hominem attack, the bread and butter of people who have a half-formed argument. The signal of a weak argument dressed in forceful garb.

The differences do tend to stop juuust at the part where monetary interests of their funders begin.

Aside from that, very different parties.

That woooshed me pretty hard :-)

Hate to break it to you, but he died in 1736

Pretty sure Fahrenheit is dead

Wym?

That’s confusing

That’s what you get for being anti-dishware

I think I’ll ignore this

This guy frets

The airspeed velocity of an unladen spankswallow depends on the skill of the spank and the proximity of the swallow, but on average? 42

Have you tried a spankswallow? Much better and less likely to flee

There’s no reason to slander shitgibbons like that

Their individual special opinions tip their score from ‘good’ to ‘bad’ for reasons that other people probably wouldn’t care about, is my point.

Find a French bakery and have one at about 7am

If they cancel someone’s vacation to provide support but can’t provide sufficient detail to define the work, they’re definitely doing something wrong

More like stupris, amirite