Das ist ein guter Ansatz, aber inkonsequent. Das Briefgeheimnis ist auch nur ein Konstrukt, mit dem Leute, die etwas zu verbergen haben, einer effektiven Strafverfolgung entgehen. Die angebliche „Unverletzlichkeit der Wohnung“ ist aber das größte Problem. Kindesmissbrauch findet meistens im Schutz privater Räume statt. Wie kann es sein, dass diese Perversen immer noch die Installation effektiver Überwachungstechnik in allen Privaträumen verhindern können? Denkt denn keiner an die Kinder?

Vielleicht war das ja zu kompliziert. Ich will es einfacher formulieren: Wenn die SPD sagt, sie wolle “Besserverdienende besteuern”, kommt am Ende raus, dass es fast jeden trifft, die wirklich Reichen aber nicht. Also ist plausibel, dass es ähnlich läuft wenn die SPD sagt, sie will hohe Erbschaften besteuern.

Das wäre als isoliertes Statement völlig in Ordnung, aber inzwischen ist ja so ein bisschen klar, wie das läuft: Du gibst erstmal einen fetten Teil vom Gehalt als Einkommenssteuer ab. Von dem, was übrig bleibt zahlst Du die indirekten Steuern, sobald Du etwas kaufst, tankst oder kurz nicht aufpasst. Wenn Du es trotzdem schaffst, etwas zur Seite zu legen um Deinen Kindern zumindest ein Bisschen mitgeben zu können, damit sie es leichter haben, kommt Kevin. Geil. Währenddessen zahlen die Otto-, Aldi- und Oetker-Familien ein paar Promille ihrer Portokasse an Anwälte, die ganz genau erklären, warum das jetzt keine Erbschaft ist, sofern nur ein Führungswechsel an der Spitze einer Stiftung.

Britain must rejoin! It is time to stop this undignified squabbling! It is time to quit fighting over petty whims! It is time to stand together, to unite and to face the great terrible evil in the very heart of europe: Belgium!

There is currently no /c/upvotebecausebutt, is there?

Don’t make this aardvark, please.

Das wird alles schon seine Ordnung haben. Wir haben ganz sicher keinen Kanzler, der eigentlich im Gefängnis sitzen müsste, und ganz sicher werden Politiker auch nicht anders behandelt als normale Bürger. Vertraut dem Staat! Der Staat ist gut!

Had to check which community this is cos I was lowkey expecting something along the lines of „testicular degloving“

Nothing outweighs the life and wellbeing of children! Therefore, cameras have to be installed in every room of every house. This is logical because more than 90% of all pedophiles operate in rooms within houses. No citizen has to worry about privacy, though. The video feeds will only be used to fight severe crimes such as pedophilia and copyright infringement.

That is true but Windows is a privacy nightmare. You may be able to mitigate the problem but it’s still windows. When your house is on fire and you tell people to please not use candles, you are technically correct because of course we don’t want more fire but does it really matter?

Actually, giving many parties a bit of your data is indeed still better than giving all of it to one. That, however, is not the point: As far as privacy is concerned, i cannot see any facts that would lead me to believe that Brave is any worse than Chrome, Safari or Edge.

So you would agree that bitching about the browser while using a stock OS is kinda pathetic?

Oh, yes, because Android is so trustworthy, right? Google would never turn evil, after all. But I suppose you are sharing your wisdom from the coziness of a Windows desktop.

Oh no, a shady, unknown neocities site is telling me to not trust my browser! Yes, I can use Firefox, uBlock and uMatrix, except on iOS, where I can’t do that, and that is where Brave does a good job. I am really tired of those „Brave baaad“ posts. Look guys, unless you are using Linux you might want to direct your attention at the huge, morally flexible company that does collect your data, no matter what browser you choose.

Wing Commander. It needed expensive hardware, like a 33MHz CPU, and some features were disabled when you had less than 1MB RAM but it was worth it. To me, there was never another one like this.

Once you make it a circle, your storage space becomes infinite!

Güle güle

Given equal numbers and technological prerequisites I would believe that old Nazis were more dangerous. Neo Nazis are just brutal lowlifes who usually turn to a hateful ideology in order to create the illusion of being basically valuable and good but held back or even oppressed by [INSERT MINORTITY]. Old Nazis were so invested in their collective psychopathic worldview that they could regard the extermination of others as something that may be pleasant or very hard or even sad but in any way just neccessary, so it had to be done.

Among other things. I doubt that there would have been any tolerance for his teeth or his tattoos. Also, he would not have been able to convince anyone that he belongs to the same race. He would have been exterminated along with the people he detests.

In Nazi Germany, the guy in the picture would have been put in a camp before he could even raise his arm.