Suckers bet, I’m not taking it.

Your sad attempt at an ad hominem rather proves my point.

Correct. You need to read it again.

Read the comment more carefully stranger.

They cannot simply shift them. There are huge regulatory machines that would need to approve such an event. At most they could cut off using some of their band and use less of it, but that comes at the cost of customer service.

A satellite passing over your head will travel about 4,500KM from horizon to horizon (assuming low earth orbit). Turning off the radios over that span of distance would mean entire countries don’t get starlink traffic any time a radio telescope needs that band, and my suspicion is they need them often.

Honestly, we need to get more of these things off earth to continue this sort of research.

Different laws. In the UK it’s generally easier to sue for defaming someone like Rowling is accused of doing.

The best lies sit on a foundation of truth

Back in my day we had books, that we had to share, and we LIKED it.

Wow, they bring good writing and get good results. Who would have thought…

Removed by mod

Why did you not understand it then?

https://academic.oup.com/her/article/34/3/321/5424102

In short, yes, but only before addiction.

The president doesn’t get to unilaterally declare law, he at best has the veto but his job is to forfill the will of the people and by extension Congress.

If congress orders the money and guns to Israel, he cannot stop them.

But that isn’t the presidents choice.

That’s expected, that’s not news.

Exactly. We spent four years playing into their hands, its going to take us decades to recover from that mistake.

Small enough to fit in your bedroom.

Says the guy that goes off topic and gets uppity when others do so back.

Not the first regional point though, you are off topic stranger.

You know bush wasn’t a democrat, right?