that’s not funding.
that’s not funding.
this, too, is rhetoric, and not evidence
this, too, is not proof, but more rhetoric.
if it were true, you could provide proof, instead of rhetoric.
I seem to recall that the anonymity of car is based on obscuring transactions through bundling, but that method was deanonymized by poisoning wallrts somehow. this was like 10 years ago so my memory is fuzzy.
saying it doesn’t make it true.
Factory farming is a response to public demand for meat.
I think this is a fiction.
no one is torturing animals or paying people to do it.
words do have meanings. what is the opposite of supernatural?
using a byproduct that would otherwise go to waste is good
no one is torturing animals.
it’s a simple question that has nothing to do with me.
if you know a way to raise animals for products at the current scale and price without any pain or discomfort, you should let us know.
if there were no pain or discomfort, it wouldn’t be torture.
synthetics are natural. they’re not supernatural.
how many farmers did they ask for their reasons for planting soybeans?
I havent changed my position at all. that’s not talking in circles.
I have read plenty, (you didn’t think I was looking all this up just today, did you?) and i have told you a story in which the objective facts are indisputable. the only point of disagreement we have is how to interpret those facts, and I have given actual reasoning for my interpretation, while you said “look it up”.
it’s not accurate to say the soy beans are grown for animals at all though. they’re grown for markets and soild health. markets value the oil far higher on a per pound basis than the rest of the bean. I just can’t believe a telling of the story of soybeans that places animal feed so prominently, when it’s literally the industrial waste that is fed to animals.
copying isn’t stealing