That’s not how privacy works though. You either have it when you don’t need it or don’t have it when you need it. You don’t just get it when you need it.

It’s not silliness to presume that you could eventually be in some situation where you need a high amount of privacy.

Maybe if you don’t actually participate in society, there’s some life circumstances that mean you would never need privacy. There’s probably like a hundred people alive like that. I don’t think they take taxis.

You can’t imagine famous people, federal investigators, Union organisers, protected witnesses, or literally anybody else that wouldn’t want their movements trackable by a company or anybody that company gets hacked by?

The urge

I think it was just exploited by conservatism but ok

Believe it or not, communicating is also the macguffin in a successful marriage.

You could spend 3/4 million on a horse, depending

Yeah quite regularly

Functional people just dgaf so pick your gaf and you’ll be solid

Yeah gasoline smells great too

I do this on purpose

I don’t explain what the right answer is

I explain to context of what was considered before coming to the answer.

For a bunch of types of people, good intentions legitimise behavior. It wasn’t legitimate behavior.

Gun control absolutely needs to happen. Until it does, news and discussions should center around decrying vigilante behavior.

It doesn’t matter what he thought. It matters what he did.

The situation of returning guns to a gun store?

He intended to confront other people open carrying while he was openly carrying.

This same mindset, you could describe cross burnings or working at the DMV as well intentioned.

Hang on let me exfiltrate my bugs in the oval office

This is going to be a pain

He did where have you been

One example was 3-year-old Annette Noe. When her parents asked Cigna to pay for two cochlear implants that would allow her to hear, we agreed to cover only one.

Wow I couldn’t imagine being this heartless and not offing myself.

It’s not dumb to call out apologetic framing in commentary. This dude doesn’t need kid gloves, and what other people like him need is a very clear description of what’s right and wrong here. This isn’t a grey area. If you go out and use your personal firearm to police other people, you are a vigilante. If you don’t think you are engaging in vigilantism, you are delusional.

Main stream news should be responsible enough to call a spade a spade in these cases.

Right so again, not well intentioned. Delusional.

well-intentioned

No. The article says

conduct “overwatch”

Meaning off the clock surveillance, for the purpose of engaging in vigilantism.

You can’t rebuild dense areas all at once, and the benefits aren’t going to be apparent until you have a good portion of the town built to the new spec.

How many terabytes is a single customer or group of customers moving that saturating their upstream would be more than a few minutes a month?

It’s not really deceptive, and backup systems and other enterprise type of things can and are configured to run off peak.