• 0 Posts
  • 176 Comments
Joined 1 年前
cake
Cake day: 2023年6月21日

help-circle


  • bisby@lemmy.worldtoScience Memes@mander.xyz#notaseagull
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    9 天前

    I’d just like to interject for a moment. What you’re refering to as a Gull, is in fact, Sea/Gull, or as I’ve recently taken to calling it, Sea plus Gull. Gull is not an categorization unto itself, but rather another component of a full identity made useful by the kingdom, phylum, class, order, family, genus, and species components comprising a full identification as defined by its scientific classification.



  • bisby@lemmy.worldto196@lemmy.blahaj.zonegame sucks rule
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    11 天前

    Sometimes games ship updates that mess with the game. I have over 20,000 hours in WoW. But my play habits from over almost 2 decades ago don’t reflect the current quality of the game.

    And some people compulsively play games they don’t enjoy because “once I get to the next thing, it will finally be fun!” And maybe this person had an awakening and realized that they will never get there… Or after this amount of time had a drastic change of heart.

    And some people leave games open when they aren’t playing.

    I’m not saying this is normal or necessarily healthy, but it’s not unfeasible.






  • If you find a villager with no job. Trap it. Place a lectern next to it. It becomes a librarian. Check what it sells. Silk touch? Nope. Break the lectern, the villager reverts to not a librarian. Villagers only keep their jobs if you have bought something from them. Replace the lectern, check (it now has new items for sale), break, rinse and repeat. Once you find it, buy it and the librarian will be locked to always sell it.

    Only downside is you need emeralds. But on the upside, you get infinite silk touch.






  • I would hope the whole thing is a joke in general.

    “The sun gives us light when it’s ‘already’ bright” is where the real logic breaks down. “I don’t need <thing> because I already have <benefit from thing>” is circular logic.

    So of course we wouldn’t have sunlight at night without the sun. but we also wouldn’t have sunlight at night without the moon.

    Whether we want to call it “more useful” than the sun… it is just as useful as the sun at night. We need both of them for the system to work. I was just trying to snarkily emphasize that we shouldn’t downplay the moon because it is “just” reflecting sunlight.