![](https://hexbear.net/pictrs/image/8efd114f-7129-4d18-ad24-81fdac42bb14.jpeg)
![](https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/pictrs/image/74e0b193-2b98-46bf-84fc-7c7e6d9a9e6c.png)
Aw shit I love more “alien” interpretations of merfolk like this, great stuff
Aw shit I love more “alien” interpretations of merfolk like this, great stuff
the artists still exist and would continue to make art even if we abolished the systems of exploitation we apply to that art.
frankly, art would instantly become far better without capitalism weighing it down
you know who this asian man reminds me of? yellow cartoon character. how is that racist btw?
Oh boy, they took a concept for an article that would take 2 minutes to read and turned it into an 8 minute video, my favorite
you came to a deleted post hours later just to add a racist redditism?
Yeah, it’s a very common joke which I argue does not work because despite the fact that there is leeway in how words are defined (that’s kind of what my entire comment is about) there is no valid definition of edible which includes mushrooms that definitely kill you if you eat them.
You’d have to use a very strange definition of edible. For something to be edible it does not only need to be able to fit down your throat, it has to be capable of nourishing you without harming you. You can swallow paper and it won’t harm you, but it also can’t nourish you and is thus inedible. You can eat this mushroom and it’ll probably provide some kind of nourishment, but then it will swiftly kill you and thus it is inedible.
I would accept a definition of edible which includes things you can’t digest. For example, gold can also be a food additive referred to by the code E175. Can’t digest it, but it doesn’t hurt you. So I could accept someone referring to gold as edible. But I think the barest, most universal element of something being edible is that it doesn’t kill you. If literal deadly poison is considered edible one must wonder what the word “edible” is even supposed to mean.
i didnt even consider that this AI shit was going to claim to be able to ID mushrooms
ok ive been a little skeptical of the idea so far but now im fully convinced. this dumb ai shit is going to get people killed. like straight up more than one person is going to die because of these upjumped autocorrects masquerading as intelligence. and no one is going to be held responsible.
tbf it probably works on most humans, they’re probably pretty intimidated
what is that apostrophe + s doing in the title? Who wrote this? A malfunctioning AI?
Alice Bell
Alice what are you doing
reddit doesn’t really have a strict email verification. you can type in whatever email you want when registering
you can literally just click “next” and sign up without an email
I think texas is working on it
congratulations: you have made a new volcano in a location much more difficult to predict
Hmm, $1 million? That sounds like a lot of money. How much money do they make in a year, I wonder? Oh, $1.6 billion. Okay, so the people responsible for this deliberate scam they pulled probably didn’t even notice the fine. Sweet. Functioning system.
Remember friends, a million seconds is about 11 days and a billion seconds is about 32 years. They fined Razer 11 days of their 50 years of revenue. Wowee! That’ll show 'em.
fuckin hell dude leave some quads for the rest of us
I mean I’m pretty sure part of the fun is staging pictures with the shortest guy in the room, I don’t think the 7 foot tall lady goes to a party in heels and then bends all the way down to talk to somebody like this by accident lol
I just looked up the elephant vs mouse segment. The way the elephants reacted, I kinda feel like they’re being cautious because they recognize a harmless lil animal and don’t want to step on it. Like they behave pretty much exactly how I do when I see a little spider or frog or cricket or something. like “whoa there buddy, you dont wanna be under my feet”