From a different post for this link: “Wow, this is so sad. I didn’t know there was a Wonder Man thing in production either.”

Sounds like it’s working

I mean if I put my hand over my left then right side of my chest, it’s pretty clear which side my heart is on

Well I guess the obvious one to me is feeling a heartbeat. It seems like that would come up even outside of the medical field (schools, “playing doctor”, heck doing the pledge of allegiance if you’re in the US)

I’ve heard people talk about mirrored organs, is that something that would be immediately obvious? Like surely every person that has the condition would know about it.

Did you feel like your work was rewarding? Were you proud of what came from your time, or did you feel the crushing weight of corporate expectations sucking out creativity?

Has the Jellyfin app improved for Roku in recent years? Last I tried it, maybe 2 years ago, it was near unusable from a UI perspective

While I think most agree with you, it’s important to note there is more to networking than WAN access. Streaming 4k in your home network over WiFi sounds pretty awesome for security cameras and other self-hosted medias.

If you were found guilty by the courts, then yes in the eyes of the courts you have a committed the crime. If and when there are appeals, new evidence, or overturned verdicts, then that evaluation would change.

The whole point ends up being that criminal as a word has a specific definition, and those who have been convicted of crimes fit that definition.

If my only measure of worth was someone’s job and the circumstances they acquired it, I would say that it is entirely irresponsible to make any fair judgement.

I don’t get it. The heck is that supposed to be

This is a bit of chicken and egg, but if you’ve committed a crime, you are a criminal. If you’ve been accused of a crime, you are not a criminal, until you are proven to be guilty.

If youve been convicted, you’ve been found guilty. If you’ve been found guilty, that means you’ve committed a crime, and are a criminal.

In order to be an inmate (barring those await trials in jails) you must be a criminal.

Your concern, I think, is stemmed from the unfortunate stigma that follows criminals long after their rehabilitation/incarceration, which is a valid stance. However, if someone is currently in a prison, as an inmate, they must be a criminal in the eyes of the law. That doesn’t mean they are criminals from then until the end of time, however.

But inmates are by definition criminals? They have been judged guilty and sentenced to time in prison.

Hotdogs are tacos and corn dogs are calzones.

Ah, I did not pick up on this being a resin printer. Thanks for the info, I’m not too aware on the tech behind resin

Not the OP, but what do you mean by this? I feel there’s an implication that it should be laid out a different way?

My issue with the demands to have apple allow iMessage on other platforms is that then we could get stuck with the expectation of catering to those users.

There already are encrypted messengers like signal, telegram, or even WhatsApp. Why aren’t people pushing at Apple users to make that switch themselves

So the post references this “greatest thread” but doesn’t provide any link to it? Seems like a weird choice.

What does this mean though? Sure it’s not new, but does it make it less of a mess?

I would say, more than likely no. That being said, just try it and see. More than likely it’ll become apparent what is and isn’t usable (I’d guess the octoprint interface would become unbearable to navigate if you’re watching something at the same time).

You might also run into hangups on octoprint’s end, potentially halting prints, though I feel like that should be avoidable (I know I’ve had prints halt when my pi was undervolted)

You’re not wrong. I am most certainly projecting how I believe I might behave given the situation. And I do agree with the idea that once you give something, it’s not up to you to decide how it’s used. Like the article is pointing out, these biases are frighteningly common that funds will be used in negative ways (drugs/alcohol).

I am, however, trying to paint a more “accurate” picture for how most people would be charitably giving/receiving (small denominations, namely). Would that change in amount be significant in how it is then utilized.