To be clear: the the current “foundationalist” supreme court have failed us and failed the common law system by reverting interpretation of laws back to the 1700s
To be clear: the the current “foundationalist” supreme court have failed us and failed the common law system by reverting interpretation of laws back to the 1700s
I don’t doubt that is how the current supreme court would interpret it. This approach of asking “how the founding fathers would think” results in exclusion of non-white citizens. On the other hand, lack of atandardized identification documents in the USA result in this mess.
If we go by the text, only “americans” have that right. Now, the important question is “what is an american”? What characterizes a “non-american” according to the founding fathers?
This is such an irrational bar to surpass
Remember the old maxim: “no one hates new immigrants more than old immigrants”… Their fellow legalized immigrants supported this outcome as well
He will have a rude awakening, more like the law being rammed on his anus along with an one way ticket
Played 15 minutes and it was very intriguing but motion sickness got the best of me and I stopped playing after barfing at the toilet
In the meanwhile, this will do:
Hey “java.lang.NullPointerException” can I borrow your pen?
boustrophedon must make a comeback
Unfortunately I don’t think Alex has any rights on any money there
American racism is alive and kicking unfortunately
Why people want to carve names on stuff… It’s the same people who write their names on bathroom doors
Oh, poor thing. It must be terrible to be one of insufferable Elon Musk’s progeny
C programmers would ask whether a null-terminated name would be acceptable
I have utmost dislike in saying this, but: “ha, suckers”
Then it is easy to dispatch them. Like Pol Pot did with anyone who seemed to be able to read and write
Looks like even 4chan data, tbh.