That’s called father-in-law

You can give the obvious right answer and you refuse to do so.

Its not a misgendering. It is a mocking of his reverence to trump and cozying up ahead of the swear-in ceremony. If it pisses him off… it’s his own transphobia to blame. We’re just encouraging him if he’s an egg.

You fucking think its not fucking serious that a 40+ year old paid a 17 yo for sex?

Thats not the entire story is it? How often is it corporate meddling?

Yes actually. Unlike you I am not ignorant of better examples. You should try to take your head out of your ass every now and then.

They arent but their donors play both sides. Its important to understand this aspect of the two parties in America. When it comes to big donors… they’re definitely playing both sides.

Inb4 People get sued for comparing women to apes…

Legally you’re wrong. Morally too but legally also.

Maybe lets not try to pretend that it is just about the costs shall we? I bet MBAs will cower at the suggestion to put up a paywall from the beginning. Afterall, bait-and-switch is their bread-and-butter.

Subscriptions weren’t the norm when we actually paid for something and got the full product. The cost to run things didn’t suddenly become a factor just now.

Only thing that changed: greed of businesses, execs, shareholders.

Ah the Highly intellectual argument that liberals use to win over voters… or is it?

Sure… it will just buff out

Hardly. As a generally liberal person… I see that the amount of scrutiny white young men go through is more than normal.

No need to convince anyone. Trump presidency ensures their will is implemented.

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Or they are quite irritated at smartass comments like that and yours. You’re a clever-mcgee pulling off the oldest play of letters and words, don’t you?

Its sarcasm. All the theatre about voting third party doesn’t make sense because people could shut up and do that if they feel they want to make a change. The loud noise is most likely coming from people trying to derail one candidate or the other.

Much better than pretending that you’re doing something while the billionaires laugh on their way to congress.

I appreciate you not escalating in response to my snarky comment with more snark or sarcasm.

On the subject: I agree that the system needs to motivate certain behaviors and disincentives others. But from the current point onwards in our cursed reality… I see no way this transition to such a system does not involve a violent revolution/uprising. I don’t see how we can even maintain such a system in the future without threat of violence towards those that put profits before everything else. I believe this because it took violence to take back 40 hour work weeks and paid vacations. Those seem trivial compared to a system overhaul from the current starting point.