You don’t understand how leadership works, do you?
Look, I’ll talk with you, but not if this is how you treat me.
You don’t understand how leadership works, do you?
Look, I’ll talk with you, but not if this is how you treat me.
Can you give an example of a time when assassination produced a better successor?
As if it matters what Trump of all people says.
How do you know the fascists won’t just rally behind somebody else like Trump, but younger and more competent?
Bravo, blazera. It’s always nice to see some concern for the truth on the internet. I mean this very unsarcastically.
I don’t think I’ve ever seen somebody publicly changing their mind on the internet until I came here. Perhaps there is something special about lemmy.
The internet needs more of this. Maybe lemmy can amplify public mind changings like this somehow…
Yep. I read a quotation from this show elsewhere. I thought it couldn’t be right, so I found the show and listened, looking for perhaps some missing context that might soften the quotation a little. No. Just no. No amount of context can ameliorate the terribleness of Lindsey Graham.
Nintendo makes it as hard as possible to use their computers generically.
Nintendo fanboys: “Thankyou, sir, may I have another?”
Woah, I have no idea what you’re talking about. “The gab one”? What gab one?
Do I have to post an image? Is the OP’s image an example of what to do or what not to do?
How many characters would I be moderating? I believe in structured moderation, where I am only required to monitor the interactions of the same 32 or so characters in this community. Moderators under this system work together by not monitoring each other’s characters. So, that works out to a strict 32:1 character:mod ratio.
The better way to automate menial tasks is not to do them in the first place.
The problem, IMO, is a system that requires applicants to apply to hundreds of jobs.
We’ll see how many seconds it takes to retrain the LLMs to adjust to this.
You are literally training LLMs to lie.
Those quote marks around the ‘wins’ are just great.
You are describing what should be done with a powerful economy. Not how to create a powerful economy. Abolishing the stock market will not encourage wealth distribution. It will make the economy weaker, and could easily make wealth concentration worse.
The right move is to reform the stock market, imposing rules on company ownership. That’s why I brought up Germany. All companies in Germany above a certain size must be 40% owned by their employees.
Canada has not been in control of its government for a long time now. This vote in parliament is just the latest indication that this will never change. I officially give up, and am moving to Europe. I have already applied to the university.
To the Liberals, the Tories, and all of their supporters: you made me leave. Please stay the fuck in Canada.
To the rest of Canada: join me.
What do you mean by “improve the economy”?
“Stupid” is a characteristic of stupid people. Do you disagree with its usage as well?
original: https://yewtu.be/watch?v=ipAnwilMncI
I like it better when I can hear Navalnyi, and the English captions are quite serviceable.
I didn’t use it as the main post because I thought there might be language rules.
Assassinations usually make things worse. Just look at what happened to the string of coups in South Vietnam during the Vietnam war.
Or, can you think of a time when assassination actually did improve matters?