It looks like Quad9 supports DoH: quad9

You’re definitely not wrong. Gray hydrogen currently is the most common source, which is a byproduct or an intended product of petroleum cracking. This also is probably a reason why most petroleum companies chose to research hydrogen in the 2000s/2010s rather than battery or other renewable technologies, since it fits nicely in their existing pipelines.

For storage, I’m pretty sure you can keep it at atmospheric pressure and temperature if space isn’t an issue, but to actually fit it in a vehicle you’d probably have to use one of the techniques you mentioned.

The Mirai’s issues seem to be that it was just a foothold for consumer hydrogen without anything really backing it. You could almost say the same about EVs/PHEVs 15 years ago and look at them now.

Honestly though, if we are able to scale up sodium batteries, grid storage and train usage might be moot. Ships could probably still use it as an alternative to diesel though.

Where did you hear this? You’re talking about distilled/unmineralized water not an acid.

Your hydrogen efficiency estimates are probably pretty close to what this bike can do. The lithium ion comparison is missing some losses, ~90% efficiency from voltage boost converter. Also, the hub motor/speed controller both add another 75% efficiency to the equation but this applies to both so we can negate it.

As for being a hydrogen hater, what did hydrogen ever do to you? I think we’d all prefer a solid state solution that would minimize losses but we don’t have enough battery infrastructure to accommodate all of our needs. Sure, hydrogen is not the panacea for fossil fuels or lithium batteries in cars but there are good uses for it. I think Hydrogen can potentially be a good replacement fuel for large shipping vessels like ships and trains, since size requirements aren’t as much of a factor, or used in grid storage as a long term or spillover storage for renewable energy when battery infrastructure is at full utilization and other means aren’t available.

It might be that someone wanted to change something that was on a website before the archive could get to it too.

While it can be used in localized electrical power generation, this isn’t exactly best suited for just that. According to the video, the typical household uses 60% of their energy towards heating on average. This type of battery would already be storing thermal energy in the form that you need for this, so any conversion losses would already be accounted for; it would just be radiative losses while distributing the heat.

Exactly. This is all about people trying to come up with a technological solution to retain the same unsustainable lifestyle we already have become complacent with. It’s just not possible; we can’t keep consuming over what’s feasible and wonder why the consequences of overconsumption keep coming up.

That definitely doesn’t sound ominous. “The sky above the port was the color of television, tuned to a dead channel.”

It’s the same line of reasoning with different excuses; I don’t like it so no one should have it.

I wonder if it’s some sort of rationale for keeping the corn subsidies while also framing it a a greener alternative to crude oil extraction.

Edit: After actually reading the article, yes this is the case. Apparently their proposed methods emit roughly 50% less emissions, which I think might be worth it depending on how much is expended to grow the corn and process the fuel. You could be right in the end though but if there are less emissions in general, it might be worth it.

Maybe a 3rd file would work? You could add all of the relevant data there and when translating between one language or the other it would prune any comments or unsupported features as the output is generated.

Oh, my mistake. Disregard me then.

That’s hilarious. I didn’t know that

I think the difference is that it sounds they are just looking for something JSON-like, just enough to edit and save a change. It might not need to be valid.

It sounds like the issue you’re running into is 2 parts:

1. Using a dedicated device for Internet connectivity.
2. Broadcasting wifi evenly throughout the house.

I think the best implementation that stays within your constraints would be to purchase a hotspot with Ethernet capabilities (like MiFi or Cradlepoint) and place it where you can best get reception. Then buy a couple meshing access points like Ubiquiti APs and place them throughout the house. Run an Ethernet cable from the hotspot to one AP and then mesh the rest. If you can run Ethernet cable to each access point using a network switch, that’s even better.

It looks like there was a manufacturer limit of 300 truck gliders per year until orange man removed the restriction. It looks like in 2018, the EPA reinstated that rule though. Source.

I’m not sure if they actually have enforced it since then but 300 doesn’t seem unreasonable.

After looking through it a little bit, it sounds like HIP is mainly used for verifying hosts’ identities. It sounds like you’ll still need firewall rules in order to create the scenario in your example, right?

I think it is. The more awareness people have, the more solutions we’ll have to work around this global fuck up we’ve inherited. Use glass, foil, or PFAS-free silicone food containers. Get a water filter that removes PFAS. Buy different cookware without PFAS.

The idea is to avoid exposure where possible. Currently it’s impossible to avoid it entirely and this has probably been the case for years. Hopefully we can have produce and products that don’t have it in the future.

My main concern is they issue a ruling so precise that it’s blurry.

That sounds a lot like the constitutional amendment they just removed the teeth from. I’m scared to think how they will screw this one over; especially since we have an authoritarian on the table.

Agreed 100%. They should be forced to add the cost of handling and recycling the material. Honestly, this should’ve been done with all plastic from the get go too.