Just watched that episode for the first time and somehow it didn’t even occur to me
I hear that’s been an issue of debate in the Vatican since around the 70s and one of the cardinals is very keen on summoning a council to settle it.
I don’t know how to read that, so just take my upvote and pray we don’t meet again.
Here in europe both are taught in elementary school.
Edit: spelling
This is a pradox though. If the scientist succeeded then the machine isn’t really using sarcasm and if they haven’t then it’s lying.
Shouldn’t a woman and a man with the same height, weight, and body-muscle percentage be basically identical in terms of athleticism or am I wrong?
Isn’t that what a password-manager should solve?
The fact that my first reaction to this was shouting “fuck you” internally probably just reenforces the idea that short people get aggressive about their height.
I like this. It’s not really helpful in the sense that it seems almost as hard as being perfect yourself, but nonetheless it’s possible, contrary to the alternative.
Don’t get fooled, that’s called stockholm syndrome.
And I removed the “the” in much the same way.
I know you’re all excited because you just understood the “correlation does not equal causation” principle, but “being religious” generally means being christian in english and I think you are just refusing to see that.
It’s been so long since I geniuenly laughed at a greentext.
why is life like this?
Because the whole thing started with anon forgeting their password, the solution for which should be complicated and secure, which it is.
That’s not very nice, trying to scam a kid out of their cool leaf for a measly ice cream.
A candian probably would start dating anon just to be polite.
I don’t see how someone couldn’t make you forget something and then remind you at the time they deem is right. I mean the point of this image is the mystery and I think that would be myterious enough.