if you’re talking about that recent pic of him floating around with a chain and a bread, that was an AI doctored photo
if you’re talking about that recent pic of him floating around with a chain and a bread, that was an AI doctored photo
this kinda shit makes me understand the sovcit stuff a little more, “just send an email with this magic subject text and your rights are secured!”
you’re so close, just why exactly do you think people are using it for these things it’s not meant for?
because every company, every CEO, every VP, is pushing every sector of their companies to adopt AI no matter what.
most actual people understand the limitations you list, but it’s the capitalists at the table that are making AI show up where it’s not wanted
babe wake up, a new bone-apple-tea just dropped
just a guess, but in order for an LLM to generate or draw anything it needs source material in the form of training data. For copyrighted characters this would mean OpenAI would be willingly feeding their LLM copyrighted images which would likely open them up to legal action.
computer science teaches you the theories of computation which absolute starts with mechanical computers.
if one didn’t study Turing’s tape machine in their compsci program then they should demand their money back.
git bisect
is just this guy jumping through portals to alternate universes where the bug either exists or doesn’t
“every situation you’re involved in is 10X more escalated than it needs to be because a gun is involved at all”
absolutely delusional, please explain how a vulnerable individual concealed carrying is escalating anything.
jfc what an absolute hellhole of a police state you’ve dreamt up. so many of your hairbrained ideas amount to “cops should have unlimited access to your private life”. how exactly do you think this would play out given the US and it’s systemic racism and classism?
yeah silly me for supporting artists with my money but also downloading drm-free copies of things so I can actually exercise a semblance of ownership. but sure, keelhaul me so you can keep your sense of smug superiority.
AI is a tool that is fundamentally based on the concept of theft and plagiarism. The LLM training data comes from artists and creators that did not consent to their work being plagiarized by a hallucinating machine.
yes, and where does the Gun Violence Archive get their numbers?
looking at their site, the answer is “themselves”… cool. Looking through their listed data it clearly includes gun violence from gang activity.
yes I know, I mentioned that in my comment. can you tell me where on that page it indicates their source of data?
your source links to this source of data, which only goes up to 2021. The table clearly states they’re counting 15 - 19 year olds.
that 6,192 number appears to come from the gunviolencearchive site, but I don’t see any source for their data other than claims that “suicide data provided by CDC”
further, a simple search of the claim “guns number one cause of death in children” will find a lot of valid critiques of this claim.
this is false, this stat deliberately counts 18 and 19 year olds as “children” and purposefully includes gang related violence. great example of using statistics to sell a story.
how many gang members are going to surrender their firearms after a ban?
a decentralized community that correctly prioritizes security would absolutely be using signed commits and other web-of-trust security practices to prevent this sort of problem
please just stop writing code. just walk away and find something else to do.
“ai helps me debate religion with my friends” is some real bleak shit
zero! i rotate mine counter clockwise
i turn mine so i can find it again if i set it down at a party
i’m curious how you think you know all of this? sounds to me like you’ve created a neat straw man that lives in your head for you to get mad at