![](https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/pictrs/image/9d88b998-129f-4e28-a089-02fe7f6297ea.png)
It really feels like SCOTUS noticed that environmentally-conscious people are advocating for expansion of rail, and will now rule in favour of this project just to spite them.
He/him
Hot high speed rail lines near you.
PM me ur sexy train pics.
It really feels like SCOTUS noticed that environmentally-conscious people are advocating for expansion of rail, and will now rule in favour of this project just to spite them.
approval for a railroad project
Let’s see…
that would carry crude oil
😭 what the heck
Why don’t you just sell your house and move?
Well, the rear wing did look exceptionally sketchy there, and he scattered a bunch of carbon fiber on the track, and the team did this to avoid a SC. Maybe a bit harsh for Pérez, but a justified penalty for Red Bull, imo.
Fidesz is nonaligned as well, judging by the polls it’ll be about 9 or 10 seats for them.
Safety car giveth, safety car taketh
So rain will arrive just as they’ve worn down the entire tread. Too bad we didn’t see anyone gamble for slicks, if the rain isn’t too intense maybe softs would be able to handle it.
Haas breaking everyone’s ankles, holy moly.
No one specific, I just wish we had international voting lists so I could vote Volt or Greens, they have no real presence in Poland.
Use your own muscles like a manly macho man, only wimpy soyboys let the machine do all the work 😎💪🦅🦅🦅🇺🇸🇺🇸
Thanks for the explanation, you really came in clutch.
Until now I was under the impression that this was the goal of these notices:
If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
Because if an LLM ingests a comment with a copyright notice like that, there’s a chance it will start appending copyright notices to it’s own responses, which could technically, legally, maybe make the AI model CC BY-NC-SA 4.0? A way to “poison” the dataset, so that OpenAI is obliged to distribute it’s model under that license. Obviously there’s no chance of that working, but it draws attention to AI companies breaking copyright law.
(also, I have no clue about copyrights)
Drive fast and break things!
Thanks for the context. I still don’t really trust the efforts to decarbonize oil, and I’d rather see it downsized or replaced (with e-fuels for example), than building new plants that are more efficient. Except we’re so reliant on oil we can’t just use less of it, so the options are limited.
What exactly is the rationale behind sending essentially a carbon tax paid by German citizens to the opposite end of the world? Other than potential for oversights and fraud, obviously. Instead of funding renewables in Germany, the money is used to “reduce CO2 emissions” during fossil fuel extraction, what the fuck?
Nice argument, unfortunately I don’t care about laws of physics
I feel called out
A few posts in my feed also have trouble loading images, so it’s possible that dbzer0 has federation problems again.
Maybe it’s just the cheddar.
Jellyfin and sin